Working Life During the Pandemic: Experienced Changes and their Implications for Occupational Well-being among Employees in Switzerland

I. Urbanavičiūtė, F. Gander, Koorosh Massoudi
{"title":"Working Life During the Pandemic: Experienced Changes and their Implications for Occupational Well-being among Employees in Switzerland","authors":"I. Urbanavičiūtė, F. Gander, Koorosh Massoudi","doi":"10.5334/spo.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented changes to numerous aspects of work such as working conditions, workload, income, nature of duties, or work-home balance that may eventually pose significant risks to employee well-being and career development. Using a person-centred approach, we examined how these changes cluster together, defining the experiences of different employee sub-groups. We then compared these groups regarding their background characteristics and selected aspects of occupational well-being (i.e., job satisfaction, job insecurity, turnover intention, work engagement, and exhaustion).\nA sample of professionally active adults (N = 600; 55% women) completed a baseline cross-sectional survey, while a subsample (n = 426) further responded to brief daily questionnaires, reporting their job satisfaction, engagement, and exhaustion over a course of five workdays.\nResults suggested three different patterns (i.e., latent classes) of pandemic-related changes at work. They characterized workers who experienced a strong decline in their workload and income (‘precarious’), those who experienced an increase in workload and a change in the quality of working conditions (‘challenged’), and those whose work situation was mostly unaffected (‘status quo’). These worker groups differed regarding their personal and professional background as well as occupational well-being outcomes. Those more strongly affected by the pandemic (the challenged or precarious pattern) were more likely to show initial background vulnerabilities, while those in the status quo group were more likely to benefit from working from home and reported the least detrimental outcomes. We discuss the implications of these findings within the conservation of resources and career sustainability frameworks.","PeriodicalId":164739,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Psychology Open","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss Psychology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/spo.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented changes to numerous aspects of work such as working conditions, workload, income, nature of duties, or work-home balance that may eventually pose significant risks to employee well-being and career development. Using a person-centred approach, we examined how these changes cluster together, defining the experiences of different employee sub-groups. We then compared these groups regarding their background characteristics and selected aspects of occupational well-being (i.e., job satisfaction, job insecurity, turnover intention, work engagement, and exhaustion). A sample of professionally active adults (N = 600; 55% women) completed a baseline cross-sectional survey, while a subsample (n = 426) further responded to brief daily questionnaires, reporting their job satisfaction, engagement, and exhaustion over a course of five workdays. Results suggested three different patterns (i.e., latent classes) of pandemic-related changes at work. They characterized workers who experienced a strong decline in their workload and income (‘precarious’), those who experienced an increase in workload and a change in the quality of working conditions (‘challenged’), and those whose work situation was mostly unaffected (‘status quo’). These worker groups differed regarding their personal and professional background as well as occupational well-being outcomes. Those more strongly affected by the pandemic (the challenged or precarious pattern) were more likely to show initial background vulnerabilities, while those in the status quo group were more likely to benefit from working from home and reported the least detrimental outcomes. We discuss the implications of these findings within the conservation of resources and career sustainability frameworks.
大流行期间的工作生活:瑞士雇员经历的变化及其对职业福祉的影响
2019冠状病毒病大流行给工作的许多方面带来了前所未有的变化,如工作条件、工作量、收入、职责性质或工作与家庭的平衡,最终可能对员工的福祉和职业发展构成重大风险。采用以人为本的方法,我们研究了这些变化如何聚集在一起,定义了不同员工子群体的经历。然后,我们比较了这些群体的背景特征和职业幸福感的选择方面(即,工作满意度,工作不安全感,离职倾向,工作投入和疲惫)。职业活跃的成年人样本(N = 600;(55%的女性)完成了一项基线横断面调查,而一个子样本(n = 426)进一步回答了简短的每日问卷,报告了他们在五个工作日内的工作满意度、敬业度和疲惫程度。结果表明,在工作中有三种不同的模式(即潜在类别)与大流行相关的变化。他们将工作量和收入大幅下降的工人(“不稳定”),工作量增加和工作条件质量变化的工人(“挑战”)以及工作状况基本未受影响的工人(“现状”)划分为三类。这些工人群体在个人和专业背景以及职业福祉结果方面存在差异。那些受大流行影响更严重的人(面临挑战或不稳定的模式)更有可能表现出最初的背景脆弱性,而那些处于现状组的人更有可能从在家工作中受益,并报告了最小的有害后果。我们在资源保护和职业可持续性框架内讨论了这些发现的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信