Dynamic routing and wavelength assignment algorithms for multifiber WDM networks with many wavelengths

Jong-Seon Kim, Daniel C. Lee
{"title":"Dynamic routing and wavelength assignment algorithms for multifiber WDM networks with many wavelengths","authors":"Jong-Seon Kim, Daniel C. Lee","doi":"10.1109/ECUMN.2002.1002104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose two dynamic RWA algorithms, the maximum-channel-path routing (MCPR) and the least utilized path routing (LUPR), which are suitable for multifiber WDM networks with many wavelengths available. Through our simulations on two network topologies, we compare the blocking probability of our proposed algorithms with the least-loaded routing (LLR) and the SPREAD, which has lower blocking probability than their predecessors. The proposed MCPR and the LUPR algorithms show lower blocking probability compared to the LLR algorithm. Our algorithms have higher blocking probability than SPREAD when the number of wavelengths per fiber is small, but they achieve more rapid improvement in blocking probability as the number of wavelengths per fiber increases. For sufficiently large number of wavelengths per fiber, MCPR yields blocking probability lower than SPREAD, and LUPR performs better than or similar to SPREAD, depending on the network topology. We believe that the reason is because MCPR and LUPR give preference to a path with more wavelengths available. Moreover, while the SPREAD algorithm considers all paths in the network to find the shortest path for an source-destination pair, our proposed algorithms search only the pre-determined paths, so their computational complexity is much less than that of SPREAD.","PeriodicalId":398555,"journal":{"name":"2nd European Conference on Universal Multiservice Networks. ECUMN'2001 (Cat. No.02EX563)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2nd European Conference on Universal Multiservice Networks. ECUMN'2001 (Cat. No.02EX563)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECUMN.2002.1002104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

We propose two dynamic RWA algorithms, the maximum-channel-path routing (MCPR) and the least utilized path routing (LUPR), which are suitable for multifiber WDM networks with many wavelengths available. Through our simulations on two network topologies, we compare the blocking probability of our proposed algorithms with the least-loaded routing (LLR) and the SPREAD, which has lower blocking probability than their predecessors. The proposed MCPR and the LUPR algorithms show lower blocking probability compared to the LLR algorithm. Our algorithms have higher blocking probability than SPREAD when the number of wavelengths per fiber is small, but they achieve more rapid improvement in blocking probability as the number of wavelengths per fiber increases. For sufficiently large number of wavelengths per fiber, MCPR yields blocking probability lower than SPREAD, and LUPR performs better than or similar to SPREAD, depending on the network topology. We believe that the reason is because MCPR and LUPR give preference to a path with more wavelengths available. Moreover, while the SPREAD algorithm considers all paths in the network to find the shortest path for an source-destination pair, our proposed algorithms search only the pre-determined paths, so their computational complexity is much less than that of SPREAD.
多波长多光纤WDM网络的动态路由和波长分配算法
我们提出了两种动态RWA算法,即最大通道路径路由(MCPR)和最小利用路径路由(LUPR),这两种算法适用于具有多波长可用的多光纤WDM网络。通过对两种网络拓扑的仿真,我们将所提出算法的阻塞概率与最小负载路由(least-load routing, LLR)和SPREAD算法进行了比较,它们的阻塞概率比之前的算法低。与LLR算法相比,所提出的MCPR算法和LUPR算法具有更低的阻塞概率。当每根光纤的波长数较小时,我们的算法比SPREAD算法具有更高的阻塞概率,但随着每根光纤的波长数的增加,我们的算法在阻塞概率上的提高速度更快。对于每根光纤足够大的波长数,MCPR产生的阻塞概率低于SPREAD,而LUPR的性能优于或类似于SPREAD,具体取决于网络拓扑结构。我们认为原因是MCPR和LUPR优先选择可用波长更多的路径。此外,SPREAD算法考虑网络中的所有路径来寻找源-目的对的最短路径,而我们提出的算法只搜索预先确定的路径,因此其计算复杂度远低于SPREAD算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信