Monopsony in the Korea Labor Market

Minki Hong
{"title":"Monopsony in the Korea Labor Market","authors":"Minki Hong","doi":"10.20464/kdea.2022.28.3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study measures the markdown, an indicator of monopsony power, in the labor market from 2000 to 2019 using Korean firm data, and examines the relationship with the labor share. Under the cost minimization, the expressions for markdown and mark-up were derived, and markdown was identified by distinguishing it from markup. \nResults show that the markdown was 2.71 on average in the 2000s and 3.56 in the 2010s. Firm's monopsony power in the labor market is very large. Labor markdown has a strong correlation with corporate sales. In the 2010s, the monopsony powers in labor market by small or medium firms were on the decline, while the monopoly powers by large firms remained high. According to the estimation results, monopoly and monopsony power negatively affect the labor share.","PeriodicalId":314783,"journal":{"name":"Korean Development Economics Association","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Development Economics Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20464/kdea.2022.28.3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study measures the markdown, an indicator of monopsony power, in the labor market from 2000 to 2019 using Korean firm data, and examines the relationship with the labor share. Under the cost minimization, the expressions for markdown and mark-up were derived, and markdown was identified by distinguishing it from markup. Results show that the markdown was 2.71 on average in the 2000s and 3.56 in the 2010s. Firm's monopsony power in the labor market is very large. Labor markdown has a strong correlation with corporate sales. In the 2010s, the monopsony powers in labor market by small or medium firms were on the decline, while the monopoly powers by large firms remained high. According to the estimation results, monopoly and monopsony power negatively affect the labor share.
韩国劳动市场的垄断现象
本研究利用韩国企业数据,对2000年至2019年劳动市场的垄断力指标“降价”进行了测量,并分析了其与劳动份额的关系。在成本最小化的条件下,推导了降价和加价的表达式,并通过与加价的区别来识别降价。结果显示,2000年代的平均降幅为2.71,2010年代的平均降幅为3.56。企业在劳动力市场上的垄断力量非常大。劳动力降价与企业销售有很强的相关性。2010年代,中小企业在劳动力市场上的垄断力呈下降趋势,而大企业的垄断力仍然很高。根据估计结果,垄断和垄断权力对劳动份额有负向影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信