Resilience Capacity Assessment of Communities in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria

R. N. Agoha, A. Obafemi, O. Eludoyin
{"title":"Resilience Capacity Assessment of Communities in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria","authors":"R. N. Agoha, A. Obafemi, O. Eludoyin","doi":"10.9734/sajsse/2023/v19i3680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study assessed the resilience capacity of communities in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. The resilience capacity was accessed based on the absorptive, adaptive and transformative capacity of the communities using Resilience Capacity Assessment Questionnaire (RCAQ). RCAQ was administered to four hundred (400) respondents and data were analysed using descriptive statistics. The findings revealed that communities were found to be within low (138), moderate (429) and high (228) vulnerability levels. The absorptive strength of the communities revealed that they have access to their saving during shock event such as flood (51.8%, Mean = 3.48, SD= 1.17) while the identified challenge was the lack of insurance coverage for various socio-economics activities in the aftermath of hazard event (51.5%, Mean = 2.90, SD= 1.33). Communities showed strength in the adaptive capacity such as diversified means of livelihood within their community (57.7%, Mean = 3.15, SD= 1.09); however, they lack early warning and natural resources management training (47.9%, Mean = 1.95, SD= 1.07). The communities showed strength in transformative attribute such as market availability for household to sell and buy agricultural product (68.5%, Mean = 3.23 SD= 1.17) but lack access to formal safety net in the community (53.6%, Mean = 2.09 SD= 1.04). The outcome revealed that resilience capacity building was hindered by poor social amenities (25.6%) and communities should be in control of their resources (25.6%) to improve resilience capacity. Conclusively, communities’ resilience capacity building process was lacking from the absorptive and transformative capacities perspective; hence, there is need for government-community engagement as a means to develop community resilience capacity.","PeriodicalId":162253,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/sajsse/2023/v19i3680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study assessed the resilience capacity of communities in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. The resilience capacity was accessed based on the absorptive, adaptive and transformative capacity of the communities using Resilience Capacity Assessment Questionnaire (RCAQ). RCAQ was administered to four hundred (400) respondents and data were analysed using descriptive statistics. The findings revealed that communities were found to be within low (138), moderate (429) and high (228) vulnerability levels. The absorptive strength of the communities revealed that they have access to their saving during shock event such as flood (51.8%, Mean = 3.48, SD= 1.17) while the identified challenge was the lack of insurance coverage for various socio-economics activities in the aftermath of hazard event (51.5%, Mean = 2.90, SD= 1.33). Communities showed strength in the adaptive capacity such as diversified means of livelihood within their community (57.7%, Mean = 3.15, SD= 1.09); however, they lack early warning and natural resources management training (47.9%, Mean = 1.95, SD= 1.07). The communities showed strength in transformative attribute such as market availability for household to sell and buy agricultural product (68.5%, Mean = 3.23 SD= 1.17) but lack access to formal safety net in the community (53.6%, Mean = 2.09 SD= 1.04). The outcome revealed that resilience capacity building was hindered by poor social amenities (25.6%) and communities should be in control of their resources (25.6%) to improve resilience capacity. Conclusively, communities’ resilience capacity building process was lacking from the absorptive and transformative capacities perspective; hence, there is need for government-community engagement as a means to develop community resilience capacity.
尼日利亚阿夸伊博姆州社区恢复能力评估
该研究评估了尼日利亚阿夸伊博姆州社区的复原能力。利用弹性能力评估问卷(RCAQ)对社区的吸收能力、适应能力和变革能力进行评估。对400名受访者实施RCAQ,并使用描述性统计对数据进行分析。调查结果显示,社区处于低(138)、中(429)和高(228)脆弱性水平。社区的吸收强度表明,他们在洪水等冲击事件期间可以获得储蓄(51.8%,平均值= 3.48,SD= 1.17),而确定的挑战是灾害事件后缺乏各种社会经济活动的保险覆盖(51.5%,平均值= 2.90,SD= 1.33)。社区生计方式多样化等适应能力较强(57.7%,Mean = 3.15, SD= 1.09);但缺乏早期预警和自然资源管理培训(47.9%,Mean = 1.95, SD= 1.07)。这些社区在变革性属性方面表现出优势,如家庭销售和购买农产品的市场可用性(68.5%,平均= 3.23 SD= 1.17),但缺乏社区正式安全网(53.6%,平均= 2.09 SD= 1.04)。结果显示,社会便利条件差(25.6%)阻碍了复原力能力建设,社区应控制其资源(25.6%)以提高复原力能力。最后,从吸收和变革能力的角度来看,社区的复原力能力建设过程缺乏;因此,需要政府-社区参与,作为发展社区恢复能力的一种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信