Back to Basics: Revisiting Proppant and Fluid Selection for Unconventional Reservoirs Using a New 2D Slurry Transport Model

P. Pankaj, L. Belyakova, V. Isaev, I. Velikanov, D. Bannikov, L. Semin, A. Tikhonov
{"title":"Back to Basics: Revisiting Proppant and Fluid Selection for Unconventional Reservoirs Using a New 2D Slurry Transport Model","authors":"P. Pankaj, L. Belyakova, V. Isaev, I. Velikanov, D. Bannikov, L. Semin, A. Tikhonov","doi":"10.2118/191422-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is often thought that in ultra-low-permeability unconventional reservoirs, proppant does not play a significant role in productivity because any proppant effectively results in a relatively infinite fracture conductivity. Although with over 75% of the treatment jobs pumped with slickwater in the shale reservoirs due to its cost benefit, it is also thought that slickwater has limited solids carrying capacity. Overflushing may compromise productivity by creating near-wellbore pinchouts. The study presented here aims to test some of these conventions through the use a new high-resolution slurry transport model in unconventional reservoirs. Hydraulic fracture propagation and solids transport are simulated across multiple wells and reservoir settings to measure the production performance of unconventional reservoirs. Wells completed in the Eagle Ford formation are studied using an integrated earth model built to capture the reservoir geology, petrophysics and geomechanics. A pseudo 3D model for fracture propagation has been coupled with a fine grid numerical simulation of proppant and fluid transport in hydraulic fracture. The transport model can distinguish and demarcate the corresponding bridging resolution. This allows capturing the effect of slurry with proppant bypassing bridged 2D elements. Multivariate analysis of over 50 cases with various combinations of hydraulic fracturing fluid with viscosity ranging from 1.5 cP (slickwater) to 362 cP (crosslinked gel) and various proppants ranging from 100 mesh to 20/40 proppants are evaluated using the 2D transport model to determine the impact on production. Additionally, various pumping schedules ranging from 750 lbm/ft to 3,000 lbm/ft are evaluated. Parametric sensitivity of the overflush fluid type and volume has been studied to measure the impact on proppant dislodgement in the near-wellbore area. Production performance for all the scenarios is studied through numerical simulation and an economic analysis workflow to evaluate the matrix for fracturing fluid and proppant selection.","PeriodicalId":441169,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, September 26, 2018","volume":"92 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, September 26, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191422-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

It is often thought that in ultra-low-permeability unconventional reservoirs, proppant does not play a significant role in productivity because any proppant effectively results in a relatively infinite fracture conductivity. Although with over 75% of the treatment jobs pumped with slickwater in the shale reservoirs due to its cost benefit, it is also thought that slickwater has limited solids carrying capacity. Overflushing may compromise productivity by creating near-wellbore pinchouts. The study presented here aims to test some of these conventions through the use a new high-resolution slurry transport model in unconventional reservoirs. Hydraulic fracture propagation and solids transport are simulated across multiple wells and reservoir settings to measure the production performance of unconventional reservoirs. Wells completed in the Eagle Ford formation are studied using an integrated earth model built to capture the reservoir geology, petrophysics and geomechanics. A pseudo 3D model for fracture propagation has been coupled with a fine grid numerical simulation of proppant and fluid transport in hydraulic fracture. The transport model can distinguish and demarcate the corresponding bridging resolution. This allows capturing the effect of slurry with proppant bypassing bridged 2D elements. Multivariate analysis of over 50 cases with various combinations of hydraulic fracturing fluid with viscosity ranging from 1.5 cP (slickwater) to 362 cP (crosslinked gel) and various proppants ranging from 100 mesh to 20/40 proppants are evaluated using the 2D transport model to determine the impact on production. Additionally, various pumping schedules ranging from 750 lbm/ft to 3,000 lbm/ft are evaluated. Parametric sensitivity of the overflush fluid type and volume has been studied to measure the impact on proppant dislodgement in the near-wellbore area. Production performance for all the scenarios is studied through numerical simulation and an economic analysis workflow to evaluate the matrix for fracturing fluid and proppant selection.
回归基础:使用新的2D泥浆输送模型重新审视非常规油藏的支撑剂和流体选择
人们通常认为,在超低渗透非常规油藏中,支撑剂对产能的影响并不大,因为任何支撑剂都会导致相对无限的裂缝导流能力。尽管由于成本效益,在页岩储层中,超过75%的处理作业都使用滑溜水,但人们也认为滑溜水的携固能力有限。过冲可能会造成近井尖突,从而影响产能。本文提出的研究旨在通过在非常规油藏中使用一种新的高分辨率泥浆输送模型来测试其中的一些常规。模拟了多口井和储层的水力裂缝扩展和固体运移,以测量非常规油藏的生产动态。利用综合地球模型对Eagle Ford地层的完井井进行了研究,以获取储层地质、岩石物理和地质力学信息。建立了裂缝扩展的伪三维模型,并结合水力裂缝中支撑剂和流体输运的细网格数值模拟。传输模型可以区分和标定相应的桥接分辨率。这使得支撑剂绕过桥接2D元件时能够捕获泥浆的效果。利用2D输运模型,对50多个案例进行了多变量分析,评估了黏度从1.5 cP(滑溜水)到362 cP(交联凝胶)的水力压裂液和100目至20/40目支撑剂的不同组合,以确定对产量的影响。此外,还评估了从750 lbm/ft到3000 lbm/ft的各种泵送计划。研究了溢流流体类型和体积的参数敏感性,以测量其对近井区域支撑剂驱替的影响。通过数值模拟和经济分析工作流程,研究了所有情况下的生产动态,以评估压裂液和支撑剂的选择矩阵。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信