Observational study of quality of life in patients with headache, receiving homeopathic treatment

G Muscari-Tomaioli , F Allegri , E Miali , R Pomposelli , P Tubia , A Targhetta , M Castellini , P Bellavite
{"title":"Observational study of quality of life in patients with headache, receiving homeopathic treatment","authors":"G Muscari-Tomaioli ,&nbsp;F Allegri ,&nbsp;E Miali ,&nbsp;R Pomposelli ,&nbsp;P Tubia ,&nbsp;A Targhetta ,&nbsp;M Castellini ,&nbsp;P Bellavite","doi":"10.1054/homp.1999.0511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study describes the results obtained from a prospective observational research of homeopathic treatment for patients suffering from headache (migraine with- and without aura and tension-type headache). Fifty-three patients were asked to complete the SF-36 questionnaire at the beginning of the treatment and after 4–6 months. The homeopathic medicine and potency were not pre-defined, but were adapted to each single patient according to individualised homeopathic prescription. Most patients (73.6%) completed the study. There was heterogeneity in the answers (patients in very poor health as well as those with only slight disorders). Analysis of the data according to the concept of ‘intention-to-treat’ showed that after therapy, the mean and median scores of all life quality dimensions rose. More than 60% of the cases experienced an improvement in pain and the limitations caused by pain, as well as in limitations in social activities and health in general. All the differences between pre/post treatment were statistically highly significant, with the strongest results in the ‘bodily pain’ and ‘vitality’ parameters (<em>P</em>&lt;0.0001).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100201,"journal":{"name":"British Homoeopathic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1054/homp.1999.0511","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Homoeopathic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475491699905118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

This study describes the results obtained from a prospective observational research of homeopathic treatment for patients suffering from headache (migraine with- and without aura and tension-type headache). Fifty-three patients were asked to complete the SF-36 questionnaire at the beginning of the treatment and after 4–6 months. The homeopathic medicine and potency were not pre-defined, but were adapted to each single patient according to individualised homeopathic prescription. Most patients (73.6%) completed the study. There was heterogeneity in the answers (patients in very poor health as well as those with only slight disorders). Analysis of the data according to the concept of ‘intention-to-treat’ showed that after therapy, the mean and median scores of all life quality dimensions rose. More than 60% of the cases experienced an improvement in pain and the limitations caused by pain, as well as in limitations in social activities and health in general. All the differences between pre/post treatment were statistically highly significant, with the strongest results in the ‘bodily pain’ and ‘vitality’ parameters (P<0.0001).

接受顺势疗法治疗的头痛患者生活质量观察性研究
本研究描述了一项顺势疗法治疗头痛患者(有先兆和无紧张性头痛的偏头痛)的前瞻性观察研究的结果。53例患者在治疗开始时和治疗4-6个月后填写SF-36问卷。顺势疗法药物和效力没有预先定义,而是根据个体化的顺势疗法处方适应每个患者。大多数患者(73.6%)完成了研究。答案存在异质性(健康状况非常差的患者和只有轻微疾病的患者)。根据“意向治疗”的概念分析数据显示,治疗后,所有生活质量维度的平均和中位数得分均上升。超过60%的病例经历了疼痛和疼痛引起的限制的改善,以及社会活动和一般健康的限制。治疗前后的所有差异在统计学上都非常显著,“身体疼痛”和“活力”参数的差异最大(P<0.0001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信