{"title":"Durkheim’s and Simmel’s reactions to antisemitism and their reflection in their views on modern society","authors":"Marcel Stoetzler","doi":"10.14220/9783737009775.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If one ever asked oneself what sociology is all about, one could do worse than consulting Auguste Comte’s 1822 manifesto, Prospectus des travaux scientifiques n8cessaires pour r8organiser la societ8, the Plan of the Scientific Works Necessary for the Reorganization of Society. It sketches out the historical-structural task that the new discipline, whose name Comte later popularized, was supposed to fulfil, namely to end-but-preserve—as the Germans would say, aufzuheben—the Revolution: safeguard its achievements from reaction as well as from further revolutions. Sociology would do so by separating the good bits of modernity from the bad bits. The former Comte saw as grounded in a secular, macrohistorical trend of European history and civilization, the latter in the undisciplined hubris of troublemakers led astray by metaphysical nonsense peddled by the Enlightenment, or more precisely, by the non-positivistic strand of the Enlightenment. Sociology would study and understand the laws of history and silence the metaphysical troublemakers. Sociology’s commitment to making that messy thing called society safe for modernity (the industrial-capitalist world system of nation states constituted and populated by modern individuals) remained tricky. Spanners were thrown into the machinery left, right, and centre by people who were not so positive about the positive state of society. Rather ironically, most of those who continued and developed the Comtean project of sociology did so by basing it on some of those ghastly metaphysical ideas from the Enlightenment, notably those of Immanuel Kant. Sociology, at least in France and Germany, emerged mostly as a set of differing blends of positivism and Kantian, or neo-Kantian, idealism. Even more ironic, though, is the fact that there were some admirers and followers of at least some aspects of Comte’s philosophy who were rather hostile to the progressivist, more liberal project into which positivism as sociology had morphed","PeriodicalId":109596,"journal":{"name":"Schriften aus der Max Weber Stiftung","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schriften aus der Max Weber Stiftung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737009775.83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
If one ever asked oneself what sociology is all about, one could do worse than consulting Auguste Comte’s 1822 manifesto, Prospectus des travaux scientifiques n8cessaires pour r8organiser la societ8, the Plan of the Scientific Works Necessary for the Reorganization of Society. It sketches out the historical-structural task that the new discipline, whose name Comte later popularized, was supposed to fulfil, namely to end-but-preserve—as the Germans would say, aufzuheben—the Revolution: safeguard its achievements from reaction as well as from further revolutions. Sociology would do so by separating the good bits of modernity from the bad bits. The former Comte saw as grounded in a secular, macrohistorical trend of European history and civilization, the latter in the undisciplined hubris of troublemakers led astray by metaphysical nonsense peddled by the Enlightenment, or more precisely, by the non-positivistic strand of the Enlightenment. Sociology would study and understand the laws of history and silence the metaphysical troublemakers. Sociology’s commitment to making that messy thing called society safe for modernity (the industrial-capitalist world system of nation states constituted and populated by modern individuals) remained tricky. Spanners were thrown into the machinery left, right, and centre by people who were not so positive about the positive state of society. Rather ironically, most of those who continued and developed the Comtean project of sociology did so by basing it on some of those ghastly metaphysical ideas from the Enlightenment, notably those of Immanuel Kant. Sociology, at least in France and Germany, emerged mostly as a set of differing blends of positivism and Kantian, or neo-Kantian, idealism. Even more ironic, though, is the fact that there were some admirers and followers of at least some aspects of Comte’s philosophy who were rather hostile to the progressivist, more liberal project into which positivism as sociology had morphed
如果有人问自己社会学是关于什么的,最好是查阅奥古斯特·孔德(Auguste Comte) 1822年的宣言《社会重组所必需的科学工作计划》(Prospectus des travaux scientifiques n8cessaires pour rrorganiser la societ8)。它勾勒出了这门新学科(孔德后来推广了它的名字)应该完成的历史结构任务,即结束——但也要保护——正如德国人所说的aufzuheben——革命:保护它的成果不受反动和进一步革命的影响。社会学会通过区分现代性的好与坏来做到这一点。孔德认为前者根植于欧洲历史和文明的世俗、宏观历史趋势,后者则是受启蒙运动(或者更准确地说,是启蒙运动的非实证主义)兜售的形而上谬论所误导的无纪律的闹事者的狂妄自大。社会学将研究和理解历史的规律,并使形而上学的捣乱者沉默。社会学致力于使混乱的社会对现代性(由现代个人构成和居住的民族国家的工业资本主义世界体系)来说是安全的,这仍然是棘手的。扳手被那些对积极的社会状态不太乐观的人从左到右,从中间扔到机器上。具有讽刺意味的是,大多数继续和发展康德社会学的人,都是基于启蒙运动中一些可怕的形而上学思想,尤其是伊曼努尔·康德的思想。社会学,至少在法国和德国,主要是作为实证主义和康德或新康德唯心主义的不同混合而出现的。更具有讽刺意味的是,有一些孔德哲学的崇拜者和追随者,至少在某些方面,对进步主义的,更自由的项目充满敌意,而实证主义作为社会学已经演变成这个项目