QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OBTAINED BY THE FUNCTIONAL TESTING WITH THE SWAYTM BALANCE APPLICATION IN RELATION TO NORMS FOR APPROPRIATE GENDER AND AGE

Nenad Nedović, Milosav Adamović, Ivana Sretenović
{"title":"QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OBTAINED BY THE FUNCTIONAL TESTING WITH THE SWAYTM BALANCE APPLICATION IN RELATION TO NORMS FOR APPROPRIATE GENDER AND AGE","authors":"Nenad Nedović, Milosav Adamović, Ivana Sretenović","doi":"10.22190/FUPES190315010N","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) is a common balance test relying on assessment tools such as the SwayTM Balance application for IOS mobile, encompassing the tri-axial accelerometers and movement sensors to measure bodily sway. Given that age and gender are important factors when using this methodology, suitable normative score sets were determined. The main aim of this study was a quantitative analysis of the ability of healthy, 21-year-old participants of both genders to maintain postural balance using the aforementioned normative values. The postural balance scoring was done by the co-application of the modified BESS test and SwayTM Balance software during a protocol organized in three-week double-scoring sessions. In order to assess the participants’ age- and gender-dependent abilities, the average balance score medians were contextualized with the appropriate normative values. All of the participants showed average results, with scores ameliorating during the procedure, and the female participants showed generally better results than the males. Focusing solely on the first-session scores revealed, however, that men had scored at the low average cut-off point, while women scored below average age- and sex-dependent cut-off points. However, in the last session both genders scored deeply within the average. This study showed average abilities of the studied participants according to the normative values, as well as a generally better performance of the women compared to the men, but it has also pointed out that, due to subject adaptation, the chosen combination of protocol and technology is of limited usefulness for balance assessment in the general population, indicating the need for protocol adjustments in future studies.","PeriodicalId":304543,"journal":{"name":"Facta Universitatis, Series: Physical Education and Sport","volume":"1962 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facta Universitatis, Series: Physical Education and Sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22190/FUPES190315010N","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) is a common balance test relying on assessment tools such as the SwayTM Balance application for IOS mobile, encompassing the tri-axial accelerometers and movement sensors to measure bodily sway. Given that age and gender are important factors when using this methodology, suitable normative score sets were determined. The main aim of this study was a quantitative analysis of the ability of healthy, 21-year-old participants of both genders to maintain postural balance using the aforementioned normative values. The postural balance scoring was done by the co-application of the modified BESS test and SwayTM Balance software during a protocol organized in three-week double-scoring sessions. In order to assess the participants’ age- and gender-dependent abilities, the average balance score medians were contextualized with the appropriate normative values. All of the participants showed average results, with scores ameliorating during the procedure, and the female participants showed generally better results than the males. Focusing solely on the first-session scores revealed, however, that men had scored at the low average cut-off point, while women scored below average age- and sex-dependent cut-off points. However, in the last session both genders scored deeply within the average. This study showed average abilities of the studied participants according to the normative values, as well as a generally better performance of the women compared to the men, but it has also pointed out that, due to subject adaptation, the chosen combination of protocol and technology is of limited usefulness for balance assessment in the general population, indicating the need for protocol adjustments in future studies.
用swaytm天平应用功能测试获得的结果与适当性别和年龄的规范的定量分析
平衡误差评分系统(BESS)是一种常见的平衡测试,它依赖于评估工具,如用于IOS手机的SwayTM Balance应用程序,包括三轴加速度计和运动传感器来测量身体摇摆。考虑到年龄和性别是使用该方法时的重要因素,确定了合适的规范评分集。本研究的主要目的是定量分析21岁的健康男女参与者使用上述标准值保持姿势平衡的能力。体位平衡评分采用改进的BESS测试和SwayTM balance软件,在为期三周的双评分过程中进行。为了评估参与者的年龄和性别依赖能力,平均平衡得分中位数与适当的规范性值相关联。所有的参与者都表现出平均的成绩,在手术过程中得分有所改善,女性参与者的成绩普遍好于男性。然而,只关注第一次测试的分数就会发现,男性的得分处于较低的平均分界点,而女性的得分低于年龄和性别相关的平均分界点。然而,在最后一次测试中,男女的得分都在平均水平以内。本研究显示研究参与者的平均能力符合规范值,女性的表现普遍优于男性,但也指出,由于受试者适应,所选择的方案和技术组合对一般人群的平衡评估有用性有限,表明需要在未来的研究中对方案进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信