Board of the Directors as an Active Participant in the Strategic Decision-Making Process: Theory and Practice (Empirical Evidence)

J. Jeżak
{"title":"Board of the Directors as an Active Participant in the Strategic Decision-Making Process: Theory and Practice (Empirical Evidence)","authors":"J. Jeżak","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1533796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the world-wide discussion on the role of boards of directors in the strategic decision-making process. The first part outlines the evolution of the boards’ role in corporations over the last three decades. The second one presents the latest studies in this field, including the author’s own research, along with key conclusions and their implications for future studies of this kind. The main thesis of the paper is the need to create a new model of the board, playing a more active role in the strategic decision-making process. Active boards of directors increase their power inside corporations and, crucially, improve the quality of strategic decisions made by companies. However, according to research conducted by P. Stiles (2001,) McKinsey & Co. (2005) and D. W. Anderson, S. J. Melanson and J. Maly (2007), most boards are still not directly involved in formulating company strategy. Also Polish supervisory boards (the German model), investigated by the author of this paper, primarily perform monitoring and control functions, though their members believe that they should be advisory and initiating bodies as well. Finally, one should bear in mind that active and knowledgeable boards are an important factor in preventing crisis situations, e.g. by forcing managers to fully account for their strategic decisions and to provide alternative solutions.","PeriodicalId":171282,"journal":{"name":"2010 Finance & Corporate Governance Conference (Archive)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Finance & Corporate Governance Conference (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1533796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the world-wide discussion on the role of boards of directors in the strategic decision-making process. The first part outlines the evolution of the boards’ role in corporations over the last three decades. The second one presents the latest studies in this field, including the author’s own research, along with key conclusions and their implications for future studies of this kind. The main thesis of the paper is the need to create a new model of the board, playing a more active role in the strategic decision-making process. Active boards of directors increase their power inside corporations and, crucially, improve the quality of strategic decisions made by companies. However, according to research conducted by P. Stiles (2001,) McKinsey & Co. (2005) and D. W. Anderson, S. J. Melanson and J. Maly (2007), most boards are still not directly involved in formulating company strategy. Also Polish supervisory boards (the German model), investigated by the author of this paper, primarily perform monitoring and control functions, though their members believe that they should be advisory and initiating bodies as well. Finally, one should bear in mind that active and knowledgeable boards are an important factor in preventing crisis situations, e.g. by forcing managers to fully account for their strategic decisions and to provide alternative solutions.
董事会作为战略决策过程的积极参与者:理论与实践(经验证据)
本文的目的是概述全球范围内关于董事会在战略决策过程中的作用的讨论。第一部分概述了过去30年董事会在企业中角色的演变。第二部分介绍了该领域的最新研究,包括作者自己的研究,以及关键结论及其对未来此类研究的影响。本文的主要论点是需要创造一种新的董事会模式,在战略决策过程中发挥更积极的作用。活跃的董事会增加了他们在公司内部的权力,至关重要的是,提高了公司战略决策的质量。然而,根据P. Stiles (2001), McKinsey & Co.(2005)和D. W. Anderson, S. J. Melanson和J. Maly(2007)的研究,大多数董事会仍然没有直接参与制定公司战略。此外,本文作者调查的波兰监事会(德国模式)主要履行监测和控制职能,尽管其成员认为它们也应该是咨询和发起机构。最后,人们应该记住,积极和知识渊博的董事会是防止危机情况的重要因素,例如,通过迫使管理人员充分考虑其战略决策并提供替代解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信