The Characteristics of ‘Podeok (布德 Spreading Virtue)’ in Daesoon Jinrihoe

Bong-ho Lee, YongKon Park
{"title":"The Characteristics of ‘Podeok (布德 Spreading Virtue)’ in Daesoon\n Jinrihoe","authors":"Bong-ho Lee, YongKon Park","doi":"10.25050/JDAOS.2019.32.0.77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to clarify the characteristics of ‘Podeok’ in Daesoon Jinrihoe. The term Podeok can cause some misunderstanding as the same word Deok (德 virtue) has long been used in the Eastern Tradition. In other words, for most people who are used to traditional thought, Podeok may be conflated with the similar word ‘Deok (virtue)’ as used within Confucianism. People who are familiar with Confucian culture might thereby misunderstand the term Podeok as an aspect of Confucian moral ethics, or they could misconstrue Daesoon Jinrihoe as having appropriated and misused Confucian ideas. Furthermore, there are other problems that could arise if people compare Daesoon Jinrihoe’s ‘Podeok’ with ‘Deok (virtue)’ as used by Laozi. While Deok in Laozi’s usage represents the ability of an individual who can exercise his or her rationality with excellence, Deok in Daesoon Jinrihoe indicates the idea of actualizing Mutual Beneficence * 제1저자. 경기대학교 교수, E-mail: jirisanin@hanmail.net ** 교신저자. 대진대학교 교수, E-mail: 2121003@daejin.ac.kr 78 대순사상논총 제32집 / 연구논문 and the conditions that enable Mutual Beneficence. If one understands Deok as used by Laozi to contain the meaning of Mutual Beneficence, then it is possible to think that the two tradition share a similar meaning of Deok as Podeok in Daesoon Jinrihoe pursues Mutual Beneficence as its ultimate value. In order to preemptively correct these misunderstandings, I need to clarify how the idea of Deok was born out of traditional thought and what meanings it embodies. Additionally, it is necessary to examine how it became meaningful in Confucianism, and how it was criticized and ascribed new meanings in Laozi’s thought. Through these clarification, it will become clear that Deok originally indicated a religious ritual that the king of the Zhou Dynasty performed after receiving the heavenly mandate and assuming rule over the nation. Later, this idea was transformed into a moral virtue and norm by Confucius. This moral virtue and norm was criticized by Laozi as an unnatural form of control as it was understood by Laozi as a teleological argument justifying whether or not lives were to be saved or sustained based on the perceived merits of each individual. On the contrary, Deok in Daesoon Jinrihoe and traditional thought stand on a totally different theological bases. Deok in Daesoon Jinrihoe is a means to practice and realize the truth of the earthly paradise of the Later World and the truth of Mutual Beneficence which were posited to the world through Kang Jeungsan’s Works of Haewon (grievance resolution) that resolved the pattern of mutual conflict that characterized the Former World. Therefore, the idea of Podeok in Daesoon Jinrihoe gains completion only on the premises of Haewon Sangsaeng (resolution of grievances for mutual beneficence) and Boeun Sangsaeng (reciprocation of favors for mutual beneficence), and the way to practice Podeok is to practice Haewon Sangsaeng and Boeun Sangsaeng. In addition, the subordinate virtues such as loyalty, filial piety, and faithfulness that exist within Daesoon Jinrihoe’s religious practice are not same as those of 대순진리회의 ‘포덕’개념의 특징 / 이봉호ᆞ박용철 79 traditional thought. They are new concepts of virtues drawn from the cosmological laws of Daesoon Jinrihoe. To be specific, the virtues of Daesoon Jinrihoe are not rules that create discrimination and mutual conflict, but are instead ethical rules established upon the basis of Heaven and Earth having been newly organized, and thus, they will bring virtuous concordance, harmonious union, and mutual beneficence. The idea of ‘Podeok’ in Daesoon Jinrihoe can be understood as a religious practice that requires doctrinal understanding and tangible practice in daily life of followers. In other words, it is not the same Deok of earlier traditional thought in East Asia, but is instead a religious truth by which practitioners realize the truth of Sangje’s Works of Haewon in human world as they practice Haewon Sangsaeng and Boeun Sangsaeng.","PeriodicalId":115590,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25050/JDAOS.2019.32.0.77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to clarify the characteristics of ‘Podeok’ in Daesoon Jinrihoe. The term Podeok can cause some misunderstanding as the same word Deok (德 virtue) has long been used in the Eastern Tradition. In other words, for most people who are used to traditional thought, Podeok may be conflated with the similar word ‘Deok (virtue)’ as used within Confucianism. People who are familiar with Confucian culture might thereby misunderstand the term Podeok as an aspect of Confucian moral ethics, or they could misconstrue Daesoon Jinrihoe as having appropriated and misused Confucian ideas. Furthermore, there are other problems that could arise if people compare Daesoon Jinrihoe’s ‘Podeok’ with ‘Deok (virtue)’ as used by Laozi. While Deok in Laozi’s usage represents the ability of an individual who can exercise his or her rationality with excellence, Deok in Daesoon Jinrihoe indicates the idea of actualizing Mutual Beneficence * 제1저자. 경기대학교 교수, E-mail: jirisanin@hanmail.net ** 교신저자. 대진대학교 교수, E-mail: 2121003@daejin.ac.kr 78 대순사상논총 제32집 / 연구논문 and the conditions that enable Mutual Beneficence. If one understands Deok as used by Laozi to contain the meaning of Mutual Beneficence, then it is possible to think that the two tradition share a similar meaning of Deok as Podeok in Daesoon Jinrihoe pursues Mutual Beneficence as its ultimate value. In order to preemptively correct these misunderstandings, I need to clarify how the idea of Deok was born out of traditional thought and what meanings it embodies. Additionally, it is necessary to examine how it became meaningful in Confucianism, and how it was criticized and ascribed new meanings in Laozi’s thought. Through these clarification, it will become clear that Deok originally indicated a religious ritual that the king of the Zhou Dynasty performed after receiving the heavenly mandate and assuming rule over the nation. Later, this idea was transformed into a moral virtue and norm by Confucius. This moral virtue and norm was criticized by Laozi as an unnatural form of control as it was understood by Laozi as a teleological argument justifying whether or not lives were to be saved or sustained based on the perceived merits of each individual. On the contrary, Deok in Daesoon Jinrihoe and traditional thought stand on a totally different theological bases. Deok in Daesoon Jinrihoe is a means to practice and realize the truth of the earthly paradise of the Later World and the truth of Mutual Beneficence which were posited to the world through Kang Jeungsan’s Works of Haewon (grievance resolution) that resolved the pattern of mutual conflict that characterized the Former World. Therefore, the idea of Podeok in Daesoon Jinrihoe gains completion only on the premises of Haewon Sangsaeng (resolution of grievances for mutual beneficence) and Boeun Sangsaeng (reciprocation of favors for mutual beneficence), and the way to practice Podeok is to practice Haewon Sangsaeng and Boeun Sangsaeng. In addition, the subordinate virtues such as loyalty, filial piety, and faithfulness that exist within Daesoon Jinrihoe’s religious practice are not same as those of 대순진리회의 ‘포덕’개념의 특징 / 이봉호ᆞ박용철 79 traditional thought. They are new concepts of virtues drawn from the cosmological laws of Daesoon Jinrihoe. To be specific, the virtues of Daesoon Jinrihoe are not rules that create discrimination and mutual conflict, but are instead ethical rules established upon the basis of Heaven and Earth having been newly organized, and thus, they will bring virtuous concordance, harmonious union, and mutual beneficence. The idea of ‘Podeok’ in Daesoon Jinrihoe can be understood as a religious practice that requires doctrinal understanding and tangible practice in daily life of followers. In other words, it is not the same Deok of earlier traditional thought in East Asia, but is instead a religious truth by which practitioners realize the truth of Sangje’s Works of Haewon in human world as they practice Haewon Sangsaeng and Boeun Sangsaeng.
《大宣真日会》中“传德”的特点
本文旨在阐明《大宣真理会》中“保德”的特点。“德”这个词可能会引起一些误解,因为“德”这个词在东方传统中一直被使用。换句话说,对于大多数习惯了传统思想的人来说,Podeok可能会与儒家思想中类似的“德”(virtue)一词混淆在一起。因此,熟悉儒家文化的人可能会误解“宝德”一词是儒家道德伦理的一个方面,或者误解“大宣真理会”是盗用和滥用儒家思想。此外,如果将大宣真理会的“德”与老子的“德”相比较,还会出现其他问题。在老子的用法中,“德”代表了一个人能够出色地运用自己的理性的能力,而在《大顺真日会》中,“德”则代表了实现相互恩泽的思想。** ** ** ** ** *发邮件:2121003@daejin.ac.kr 78发邮件:发邮件:发邮件:发邮件:发邮件:发邮件:发邮件:发邮件:发邮件:发邮件:发邮件:发邮件:发邮件:发邮件:发邮件:发邮件:发邮件:发邮件如果把老子的“德”理解为“互益”的意思,就可以认为这两种传统的“德”的意思与《大宣真日会》中的“宝德”以“互益”为终极价值是相似的。为了先发制人地纠正这些误解,我需要澄清德的概念是如何从传统思想中产生的,以及它所包含的意义。此外,有必要考察它是如何在儒家思想中变得有意义的,以及它是如何在老子思想中受到批评和赋予新的意义的。通过这样的解释,可以看出,德德原本是指周朝国王接受天命,统治国家后进行的宗教仪式。后来,这一思想被孔子转化为一种道德美德和规范。这种道德美德和规范被老子批评为一种不自然的控制形式,因为它被老子理解为一种目的论论证,证明生命是否应该被拯救或维持,这是基于每个人的优点。相反,《大宣真理会》中的德与传统思想站在完全不同的神学基础上。《大宣真理会》中的德是通过姜正山的《海原》(怨解)向世界提出的解决前世界相互矛盾格局的后世界人间天堂的真理和相互恩泽的真理的实践和实现的手段。因此,《大顺真理会》中的“保德”思想只有在“海原相生”和“恩相生”的前提下才能完成,而“保德”的修行方法就是“海原相生”和“恩相生”。此外,大宣真日会宗教实践中存在的忠诚、孝顺、忠诚等从属美德,与传统思想中存在的“大宣真日会”、“大宣真日会”、“大宣真日会”、“大宣真日会”、“大宣真日会”、“大宣真日会”、“大宣真日会”、“大宣真日会”、“大宣真日会”、“大宣真日会”等不同。它们是从大宣真理会的宇宙法则中汲取的新的美德概念。具体来说,《大宣真日会》的德性并不是造成歧视和相互冲突的规则,而是在天地重新组织的基础上建立的伦理规则,因此会带来德性的和谐、和谐的结合、相互的恩惠。《大宣真理会》中的“宝德”思想可以理解为需要信徒们理解教义,并在日常生活中切实实践的宗教实践。换句话说,它不是早期东亚传统思想的德,而是实践者在实践海原上生和宝恩上生的过程中,在人类世界中认识上济《海原经》的真理的一种宗教真理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信