Assessing the Insurance Role of Tort Liability after Calabresi

W. Viscusi, J. Hersch
{"title":"Assessing the Insurance Role of Tort Liability after Calabresi","authors":"W. Viscusi, J. Hersch","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2189090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Calabresi’s theory of tort liability (1961) as a risk distribution mechanism established insurance as an objective of tort liability. Calabresi’s risk-spreading concept of tort has provided the impetus for much of the subsequent development of tort liability doctrine, including risk-utility analysis and strict liability. Calabresi’s analysis remains a powerful basis for modern tort liability. However, high transactions costs, correlated risks, catastrophic losses, mass toxic torts, shifts in liability rules over time, noneconomic damages, and punitive damages affect the functioning of tort liability as an insurance mechanism. Despite some limitations of tort liability as insurance, tort compensation serves both a compensatory and deterrence role. Tort liability retains a valuable risk-spreading function in many situations and may be superior to alternative institutional mechanisms in fostering incentives.","PeriodicalId":340204,"journal":{"name":"Vanderbilt University Law School","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vanderbilt University Law School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2189090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Calabresi’s theory of tort liability (1961) as a risk distribution mechanism established insurance as an objective of tort liability. Calabresi’s risk-spreading concept of tort has provided the impetus for much of the subsequent development of tort liability doctrine, including risk-utility analysis and strict liability. Calabresi’s analysis remains a powerful basis for modern tort liability. However, high transactions costs, correlated risks, catastrophic losses, mass toxic torts, shifts in liability rules over time, noneconomic damages, and punitive damages affect the functioning of tort liability as an insurance mechanism. Despite some limitations of tort liability as insurance, tort compensation serves both a compensatory and deterrence role. Tort liability retains a valuable risk-spreading function in many situations and may be superior to alternative institutional mechanisms in fostering incentives.
卡拉布雷西事件后侵权责任的保险作用评估
Calabresi的侵权责任理论(1961)作为一种风险分配机制,将保险确立为侵权责任的目标。卡拉布雷西的侵权风险扩散概念为侵权责任理论的后续发展提供了动力,包括风险效用分析和严格责任。卡拉布雷西的分析仍然是现代侵权责任的有力基础。然而,高交易成本、相关风险、灾难性损失、大规模有毒侵权、责任规则随时间的变化、非经济损害赔偿和惩罚性损害赔偿影响了侵权责任作为一种保险机制的功能。尽管侵权责任作为保险存在一定的局限性,但侵权赔偿具有补偿和威慑双重作用。侵权责任在许多情况下保留了有价值的风险分散功能,并且在促进激励方面可能优于其他制度机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信