Randomness vs. time: de-randomization under a uniform assumption

R. Impagliazzo, A. Wigderson
{"title":"Randomness vs. time: de-randomization under a uniform assumption","authors":"R. Impagliazzo, A. Wigderson","doi":"10.1109/SFCS.1998.743524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We prove that if BPP/spl ne/EXP, then every problem in BPP can be solved deterministically in subexponential time on almost every input (on every samplable ensemble for infinitely many input sizes). This is the first derandomization result for BPP based on uniform, noncryptographic hardness assumptions. It implies the following gap in the average-instance complexities of problems in BPP: either these complexities are always sub-exponential or they contain arbitrarily large exponential functions. We use a construction of a small \"pseudorandom\" set of strings from a \"hard function\" in EXP which is identical to that used in the analogous non-uniform results described previously. However, previous proofs of correctness assume the \"hard function\" is not in P/poly. They give a non-constructive argument that a circuit distinguishing the pseudo-random strings from truly random strings implies that a similarly-sized circuit exists computing the \"hard function\". Our main technical contribution is to show that, if the \"hard function\" has certain properties, then this argument can be made constructive. We then show that, assuming ESP/spl sube/P/poly, there are EXP-complete functions with these properties.","PeriodicalId":228145,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.98CB36280)","volume":"2001 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"183","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.98CB36280)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1998.743524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 183

Abstract

We prove that if BPP/spl ne/EXP, then every problem in BPP can be solved deterministically in subexponential time on almost every input (on every samplable ensemble for infinitely many input sizes). This is the first derandomization result for BPP based on uniform, noncryptographic hardness assumptions. It implies the following gap in the average-instance complexities of problems in BPP: either these complexities are always sub-exponential or they contain arbitrarily large exponential functions. We use a construction of a small "pseudorandom" set of strings from a "hard function" in EXP which is identical to that used in the analogous non-uniform results described previously. However, previous proofs of correctness assume the "hard function" is not in P/poly. They give a non-constructive argument that a circuit distinguishing the pseudo-random strings from truly random strings implies that a similarly-sized circuit exists computing the "hard function". Our main technical contribution is to show that, if the "hard function" has certain properties, then this argument can be made constructive. We then show that, assuming ESP/spl sube/P/poly, there are EXP-complete functions with these properties.
随机vs.时间:统一假设下的去随机化
我们证明了如果BPP/spl ne/EXP,那么BPP中的每一个问题都可以在几乎每一个输入(对于无限多个输入大小的每一个可采样集合)的次指数时间内确定性地解决。这是基于统一的非加密硬度假设的BPP的第一个非随机化结果。这意味着BPP中问题的平均实例复杂性存在以下差距:这些复杂性要么总是次指数的,要么包含任意大的指数函数。我们从EXP中的“硬函数”中构造一个小的“伪随机”字符串集,这与前面描述的类似的非均匀结果中使用的构造相同。然而,之前的正确性证明假设“硬函数”不在P/poly中。他们给出了一个非建设性的论点,即一个区分伪随机字符串和真正随机字符串的电路意味着存在一个类似大小的电路来计算“硬函数”。我们的主要技术贡献是表明,如果“硬函数”具有某些属性,那么这个论证可以是建设性的。然后我们证明,假设ESP/spl子/P/聚,存在具有这些性质的exp完备函数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信