{"title":"Hybridity and the Quest for Identity in Tayeb Salih’s Season of Migration to the North (1969)","authors":"Lahcen Ait Idir","doi":"10.30958/AJP.6-1-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The construction of \"otherness\" in postcolonial literature is ostensible in Tayeb Salih’s Season of Migration to the North. Salih’s narrative, by means of a device of reversal, renarrates Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness in such a way that it challenges the ideological claims of empire embedded in it. Such concept of Otherness seems to entail unity and purity of the two entities of Self and Other as they are ascribed two clear-cut types of qualities that draw a neat-division between them, and deny any influence that one might have on the other, namely in moments and spaces of encounter and negotiation. Yet, during and after colonial and cultural encounters and migratory processes that the world has experienced, such concept of Other/Otherness is conceived of as being erroneous; for identities, a complex concept indeed, have been in a perpetual flux to the point that hybridity is the dominant trait of colonial and postcolonial subjects. In this line of thought, hybridity tends to debunk the system of binarism which is mistakenly deployed in the representation of \"selves\" and \"others\". Such binarism is, however, drawn into a Lacanian mirror-image wherein the identity of Self/Other is complementary; for only in encountering the Other does the Self know itself. This paper intends to examine the manifestations of hybridity along with the question of the Self’s quest for identity in Season of Migration to the North. In the light of the different thoughts that have informed the concept of hybridity, the paper also looks at signs of ambivalence and mimicry in the work of Tayeb Salih.","PeriodicalId":199513,"journal":{"name":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/AJP.6-1-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The construction of "otherness" in postcolonial literature is ostensible in Tayeb Salih’s Season of Migration to the North. Salih’s narrative, by means of a device of reversal, renarrates Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness in such a way that it challenges the ideological claims of empire embedded in it. Such concept of Otherness seems to entail unity and purity of the two entities of Self and Other as they are ascribed two clear-cut types of qualities that draw a neat-division between them, and deny any influence that one might have on the other, namely in moments and spaces of encounter and negotiation. Yet, during and after colonial and cultural encounters and migratory processes that the world has experienced, such concept of Other/Otherness is conceived of as being erroneous; for identities, a complex concept indeed, have been in a perpetual flux to the point that hybridity is the dominant trait of colonial and postcolonial subjects. In this line of thought, hybridity tends to debunk the system of binarism which is mistakenly deployed in the representation of "selves" and "others". Such binarism is, however, drawn into a Lacanian mirror-image wherein the identity of Self/Other is complementary; for only in encountering the Other does the Self know itself. This paper intends to examine the manifestations of hybridity along with the question of the Self’s quest for identity in Season of Migration to the North. In the light of the different thoughts that have informed the concept of hybridity, the paper also looks at signs of ambivalence and mimicry in the work of Tayeb Salih.
后殖民文学中“他者性”的建构在塔伊布·萨利赫的《北方迁徙的季节》中表现得很明显。萨利赫的叙述,通过一种逆转的手法,重新演绎了约瑟夫·康拉德(Joseph Conrad)的《黑暗之心》(Heart of Darkness),以一种挑战其中嵌入的帝国意识形态主张的方式。这种他者性的概念似乎包含了自我和他者这两个实体的统一性和纯洁性,因为它们被归为两种明确的性质,在它们之间划清界限,并否认任何一方可能对另一方产生的影响,即在相遇和协商的时刻和空间。然而,在世界经历的殖民和文化接触和移民过程期间和之后,这种“他者”/“他者”的概念被认为是错误的;身份是一个复杂的概念,它一直在不断变化,以至于混杂性成为殖民和后殖民主体的主要特征。在这条思路中,混合倾向于揭穿二元主义体系,这种二元主义被错误地部署在“自我”和“他者”的表征中。然而,这样的二元论被拉康的镜像所吸引,其中自我/他者的同一性是互补的;因为只有在遇到大他者时,自我才认识自己。本文旨在探讨《北上迁徙》中混杂性的表现以及自我对身份的追求问题。鉴于混合概念的不同思想,本文也着眼于Tayeb Salih作品中矛盾心理和模仿的迹象。