Accuracy Computer-Guided Implant Placement using 3D Planning Software

G. Hakobyan
{"title":"Accuracy Computer-Guided Implant Placement using 3D Planning Software","authors":"G. Hakobyan","doi":"10.37191/mapsci-jdr-1(1)-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of implant treatment using computer 3D modeling and surgical guided.\n\nMaterials and Methods: The study included 148 patients who underwent prosthodontics rehabilitation using dental implants in 2015-2020. 3D computer-aided modeling and surgical guide were used to plan the operation. To conduct a comparative analysis of the treatment results, two groups were formed: In group A (included 75 patients, fully guided surgery), in group B (included 73 patients).\n\nResults: In patients Group A intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications were noted (errors in the position, inclination), anatomical risk structures were invaded, after 3 years producing a survival rate of 96.2% In patients Group B, intraoperative complications were recorded; membrane perforation 4, errors in the position of the implants 16, the inclination of the implants 18, fenestration 12, after 3 years producing a survival rate of 97.6%. Mean marginal bone loss (MBL) patients in Group A were significantly higher than patients in group B (p < 0.05). In patients Group A the average surgical time from time of anesthesia to the placement of the healing abutment was 10.6 ± 2.9 min per implant, in patients Group B, the average surgical time was 16.4 ± 1.5 min per implant.\n\nConclusion: The 3D modeling method and the controlled positioning of the implant allows surgical access with minimal trauma, reducing treatment time and complications.","PeriodicalId":129602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Reports","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37191/mapsci-jdr-1(1)-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of implant treatment using computer 3D modeling and surgical guided. Materials and Methods: The study included 148 patients who underwent prosthodontics rehabilitation using dental implants in 2015-2020. 3D computer-aided modeling and surgical guide were used to plan the operation. To conduct a comparative analysis of the treatment results, two groups were formed: In group A (included 75 patients, fully guided surgery), in group B (included 73 patients). Results: In patients Group A intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications were noted (errors in the position, inclination), anatomical risk structures were invaded, after 3 years producing a survival rate of 96.2% In patients Group B, intraoperative complications were recorded; membrane perforation 4, errors in the position of the implants 16, the inclination of the implants 18, fenestration 12, after 3 years producing a survival rate of 97.6%. Mean marginal bone loss (MBL) patients in Group A were significantly higher than patients in group B (p < 0.05). In patients Group A the average surgical time from time of anesthesia to the placement of the healing abutment was 10.6 ± 2.9 min per implant, in patients Group B, the average surgical time was 16.4 ± 1.5 min per implant. Conclusion: The 3D modeling method and the controlled positioning of the implant allows surgical access with minimal trauma, reducing treatment time and complications.
使用3D规划软件精确计算机引导种植体放置
目的:评价计算机三维建模和手术引导下种植体治疗的效果。材料与方法:本研究纳入2015-2020年使用种植体进行口腔修复康复的148例患者。采用三维计算机辅助建模和手术指导进行手术规划。为对治疗结果进行比较分析,分为两组:a组(75例,全引导手术),B组(73例)。结果:A组患者术中或术后立即出现并发症(体位、倾斜度错误),侵犯解剖危险结构,3年后生存率为96.2%;B组患者术中出现并发症;膜穿孔4例,种植体位置错误16例,种植体倾斜18例,开窗12例,3年后成活率为97.6%。A组平均边缘骨质流失(MBL)显著高于B组(p < 0.05)。A组从麻醉时间到愈合基台放置的平均手术时间为10.6±2.9 min /个种植体,B组平均手术时间为16.4±1.5 min /个种植体。结论:三维建模方法和种植体的控制定位使手术进入创伤最小,减少了治疗时间和并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信