Discovering the Educational Power of Literature: Coluccio Salutati and Motoori Norinaga

Morimichi Kato
{"title":"Discovering the Educational Power of Literature: Coluccio Salutati and Motoori Norinaga","authors":"Morimichi Kato","doi":"10.7571/esjkyoiku.16.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, teaching literature has an established place within the school and university curricula in Western and East Asian countries. This seems so natural that we take the educational role of literature for granted. However, history teaches us that elevating literature to an academic subject required a defense of literature against the critical voices raised by philosophy and religion. This criticism was centered on the moral value of literature. This paper explores two prominent defenders of literature in the West and the East: Coluccio Salutati (1332-1406) and Motoori Norinaga (1730-1801). Salutati defended the educational significance of ancient poetry against the criticism from Scholasticism, while Norinaga defended The Tale of Genji against the criticism from Buddhism and Confucianism. The paper consists of two parts. The first part is ded icated to the analysis of the arguments deployed by Salutati and Norinaga in defense of literature. Whereas Salutati insists on the philosophical nature of poetry as allegory, Norinaga sees the educational significance of The Tale of Genji in teaching of mono no aware . The second part digs deeper and reveals the respective horizon of each position as the tradition of philosophy and the tradition of waka poetry.","PeriodicalId":205276,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies in Japan","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Studies in Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7571/esjkyoiku.16.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today, teaching literature has an established place within the school and university curricula in Western and East Asian countries. This seems so natural that we take the educational role of literature for granted. However, history teaches us that elevating literature to an academic subject required a defense of literature against the critical voices raised by philosophy and religion. This criticism was centered on the moral value of literature. This paper explores two prominent defenders of literature in the West and the East: Coluccio Salutati (1332-1406) and Motoori Norinaga (1730-1801). Salutati defended the educational significance of ancient poetry against the criticism from Scholasticism, while Norinaga defended The Tale of Genji against the criticism from Buddhism and Confucianism. The paper consists of two parts. The first part is ded icated to the analysis of the arguments deployed by Salutati and Norinaga in defense of literature. Whereas Salutati insists on the philosophical nature of poetry as allegory, Norinaga sees the educational significance of The Tale of Genji in teaching of mono no aware . The second part digs deeper and reveals the respective horizon of each position as the tradition of philosophy and the tradition of waka poetry.
发现文学的教育力量:《致敬》与纪永元典
今天,文学教学在西方和东亚国家的学校和大学课程中占有一席之地。这似乎很自然,我们认为文学的教育作用是理所当然的。然而,历史告诉我们,要把文学提升为一门学术学科,就必须对哲学和宗教提出的批评声音进行辩护。这种批评主要围绕文学的道德价值展开。本文探讨了西方和东方两位杰出的文学捍卫者:Coluccio Salutati(1332-1406)和Norinaga(1730-1801)。《敬礼》为古诗的教育意义辩护,反对经院哲学的批评;《野永》为《源氏物语》辩护,反对佛教和儒家的批评。本文由两部分组成。第一部分主要分析了拜塔提和信永为文学辩护的论点。《敬礼》强调诗歌的哲学本质是寓言,而Norinaga则认为《源氏物语》具有教育意义。第二部分深入挖掘,揭示了哲学传统与和歌诗歌传统这两种立场各自的视域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信