The effectiveness comparison of appendectomy action through the antibiotic therapy administration in acute appendicitis patients

Shelvy Yuliavita, Ivy Fu Nakamura, Eirene Priscilla Caroline Simatupang, Michelle Sardjono, Nicolas Nurjadi
{"title":"The effectiveness comparison of appendectomy action through the antibiotic therapy administration in acute appendicitis patients","authors":"Shelvy Yuliavita, Ivy Fu Nakamura, Eirene Priscilla Caroline Simatupang, Michelle Sardjono, Nicolas Nurjadi","doi":"10.35335/midwifery.v11i1.1208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research to compare the effectiveness of appendectomy by administering non-operative management in the form of antibiotics in acute appendicitis patients.  The research method used descriptive qualitative through the Literature Review (LR) approach. The data source used a secondary source. Data analysis technique selects literature based on title, year, and indexed articles, then reviews articles that match the subject matter. the articles from those journals are compared to find the differences and similarities. A literature review of four PubMed, DOAJ, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases published in the last five years, i.e. from 2018-2022.  Twelve pieces of literature were obtained and reported the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure. Apshortextomy keeps the gold standard with a lower risk of recurrence and severity and a higher treatment success rate. Appendectomy is also required for appendicitis cases with complications. However, antibiotic therapy has advantages with lower levels of complications, fewer costs, and fewer hospital stays. The success rate of non-operative therapy in the form of antibiotics can reach 65-75%, while it can reach 67,1% in children. There are differences in research results related to the effectiveness of appendectomy and antibiotic therapy in acute appendicitis patients. Each of these therapeutic procedures has its advantages and disadvantages. It is very important to be concerned about the urgency and expectations of the patient in selecting this therapy.","PeriodicalId":273270,"journal":{"name":"Science Midwifery","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35335/midwifery.v11i1.1208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research to compare the effectiveness of appendectomy by administering non-operative management in the form of antibiotics in acute appendicitis patients.  The research method used descriptive qualitative through the Literature Review (LR) approach. The data source used a secondary source. Data analysis technique selects literature based on title, year, and indexed articles, then reviews articles that match the subject matter. the articles from those journals are compared to find the differences and similarities. A literature review of four PubMed, DOAJ, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases published in the last five years, i.e. from 2018-2022.  Twelve pieces of literature were obtained and reported the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure. Apshortextomy keeps the gold standard with a lower risk of recurrence and severity and a higher treatment success rate. Appendectomy is also required for appendicitis cases with complications. However, antibiotic therapy has advantages with lower levels of complications, fewer costs, and fewer hospital stays. The success rate of non-operative therapy in the form of antibiotics can reach 65-75%, while it can reach 67,1% in children. There are differences in research results related to the effectiveness of appendectomy and antibiotic therapy in acute appendicitis patients. Each of these therapeutic procedures has its advantages and disadvantages. It is very important to be concerned about the urgency and expectations of the patient in selecting this therapy.
急性阑尾炎患者经抗生素治疗后阑尾切除术效果的比较
本研究的目的是比较急性阑尾炎患者阑尾切除术非手术治疗的有效性,以抗生素的形式。研究方法采用文献综述(LR)的描述性定性方法。数据源使用了辅助源。数据分析技术根据标题、年份和索引文章选择文献,然后审查与主题匹配的文章。对这些期刊上的文章进行比较,找出异同。对过去五年(即2018-2022年)出版的PubMed、DOAJ、Cochrane和Google Scholar四个数据库的文献综述。我们获得了12篇文献,并报道了每种方法的优缺点。短截术保持了金标准,复发风险和严重程度较低,治疗成功率较高。有并发症的阑尾炎病例也需要阑尾切除术。然而,抗生素治疗的优点是并发症水平较低,费用较低,住院时间较短。抗生素形式的非手术治疗成功率可达65-75%,儿童可达67.1%。急性阑尾炎患者阑尾切除术与抗生素治疗的有效性相关研究结果存在差异。每种治疗方法都有其优点和缺点。在选择这种疗法时,关注患者的紧迫性和期望是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信