Public Value Theory: Reconciling Public Interests, AdministrativeAutonomy and Efficiency

G. Turkel, Eli Turkel
{"title":"Public Value Theory: Reconciling Public Interests, AdministrativeAutonomy and Efficiency","authors":"G. Turkel, Eli Turkel","doi":"10.4172/2315-7844.1000189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public Value Theory aims at reinvigorating the role of publicly formed values in public administration theory and research. It attempts to reconcile the conceptual antagonisms between Traditional Public Administration that seeks to limit corruption and bring expertise to administration by establishing a more autonomous legal rational organization and New Public Management that focuses almost exclusively on sharply reducing public bureaucracy through measures and organizational practices based on economic efficiency. Rather than viewing these divergent approaches to public administration either as dichotomies or rejecting them, Public Value Theory recognizes the important dimensions of public administration that they raise and incorporates their most salient features in a more inclusive approach that emphasizes the role of values. This paper locates Public Value Theory in the historical formation of theoretical approaches to public administration. Focusing on key theoretical texts and secondary sources, the paper provides internal critiques of Traditional Public Administration and New Public Management and discusses the limits of Public Value Theory. Substantively, the paper shows that Public Value Theory seeks to reconcile and balance contradictory approaches to public administration and the implementation of public policy. Public Value Theory attempts to join economic efficiency, organizational practices, rationality and independence in public administration, and the formation of public values and interests in an encompassing approach. Public Value Theory is both less insistent on specific organizational forms of public administration than Traditional Public Administration and less focused on narrowly construed criteria of efficiency than New Public Management. The paper concludes by briefly considering criticisms of Public Value theory that are concerned with its insufficient attention to the political formation of values and interests.","PeriodicalId":413735,"journal":{"name":"Review of Public Administration and Management","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Public Administration and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2315-7844.1000189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Public Value Theory aims at reinvigorating the role of publicly formed values in public administration theory and research. It attempts to reconcile the conceptual antagonisms between Traditional Public Administration that seeks to limit corruption and bring expertise to administration by establishing a more autonomous legal rational organization and New Public Management that focuses almost exclusively on sharply reducing public bureaucracy through measures and organizational practices based on economic efficiency. Rather than viewing these divergent approaches to public administration either as dichotomies or rejecting them, Public Value Theory recognizes the important dimensions of public administration that they raise and incorporates their most salient features in a more inclusive approach that emphasizes the role of values. This paper locates Public Value Theory in the historical formation of theoretical approaches to public administration. Focusing on key theoretical texts and secondary sources, the paper provides internal critiques of Traditional Public Administration and New Public Management and discusses the limits of Public Value Theory. Substantively, the paper shows that Public Value Theory seeks to reconcile and balance contradictory approaches to public administration and the implementation of public policy. Public Value Theory attempts to join economic efficiency, organizational practices, rationality and independence in public administration, and the formation of public values and interests in an encompassing approach. Public Value Theory is both less insistent on specific organizational forms of public administration than Traditional Public Administration and less focused on narrowly construed criteria of efficiency than New Public Management. The paper concludes by briefly considering criticisms of Public Value theory that are concerned with its insufficient attention to the political formation of values and interests.
公共价值理论:协调公共利益、行政自治与效率
公共价值理论旨在重振公共价值在公共行政理论和研究中的作用。它试图调和传统公共行政之间的概念对立,传统公共行政试图通过建立一个更自主的法律理性组织来限制腐败并为行政管理带来专门知识,而新公共管理则几乎完全专注于通过基于经济效率的措施和组织实践来大幅减少公共官僚主义。公共价值理论没有将这些不同的公共行政方法视为二分法或拒绝它们,而是认识到它们提出的公共行政的重要方面,并将其最显著的特征纳入一个更包容的方法,强调价值的作用。本文将公共价值理论置于公共行政理论方法的历史形成之中。本文以重要的理论文本和二手资料为中心,对传统公共行政和新公共管理进行了内部批判,并讨论了公共价值理论的局限性。从本质上讲,本文表明公共价值理论试图调和和平衡公共行政和公共政策实施的矛盾方法。公共价值理论试图将公共管理中的经济效率、组织实践、理性和独立性,以及公共价值和公共利益的形成,以一种包容的方式联系起来。公共价值理论既不像传统公共行政那样坚持公共行政的具体组织形式,也不像新公共管理那样注重狭义的效率标准。最后,本文简要回顾了对公共价值理论的批评,这些批评涉及对价值和利益的政治形成关注不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信