{"title":"Catholic Schools and Inclusive Special Education: A Reponse from the Field to \"Why Inclusion Isn't Coming, It is Already Here\"","authors":"Molly Bullock, Frank W. O’Linn","doi":"10.15365/JOCE.2302052020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"F aggella-Luby and Engel (this issue) trace the cause for inclusion in Catholic schools to the roots of our faith and uphold it rightly as integral to our identities as Catholic communities. Making a strong and compelling argument that inclusive education can no longer be viewed as an optional practice within Catholic schools, the authors review available data to illustrate that Catholic schools have been educating students with diverse learning needs for decades, using whatever means possible. Moreover, the article is a call for more nuanced data and research on the state of inclusion in Catholic schools. Faggella-Luby and Engel outline a roadmap for transforming the narrative around inclusion in Catholic schools by reviewing research, models, trends, and surfacing dangerous misconceptions. Highlighting the advantages for all learners to have classrooms in which all students are present to receive instruction informed by each students’ specific learning strengths and challenges, the authors urge that if we want to meet the needs of all of our students, then we need to take the emphasis off of labels and instead design instruction that is student-centered.","PeriodicalId":248502,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Catholic Education","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Catholic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15365/JOCE.2302052020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
F aggella-Luby and Engel (this issue) trace the cause for inclusion in Catholic schools to the roots of our faith and uphold it rightly as integral to our identities as Catholic communities. Making a strong and compelling argument that inclusive education can no longer be viewed as an optional practice within Catholic schools, the authors review available data to illustrate that Catholic schools have been educating students with diverse learning needs for decades, using whatever means possible. Moreover, the article is a call for more nuanced data and research on the state of inclusion in Catholic schools. Faggella-Luby and Engel outline a roadmap for transforming the narrative around inclusion in Catholic schools by reviewing research, models, trends, and surfacing dangerous misconceptions. Highlighting the advantages for all learners to have classrooms in which all students are present to receive instruction informed by each students’ specific learning strengths and challenges, the authors urge that if we want to meet the needs of all of our students, then we need to take the emphasis off of labels and instead design instruction that is student-centered.
F aggella-Luby和Engel(本期)将天主教学校包容的原因追溯到我们信仰的根源,并正确地将其视为我们作为天主教社区身份的一部分。作者提出了一个强有力的、令人信服的论点,即全纳教育不能再被视为天主教学校的一种可选择的做法,他们回顾了现有的数据,以说明天主教学校几十年来一直在用各种可能的方法教育有不同学习需求的学生。此外,这篇文章呼吁对天主教学校的包容性状况进行更细致入微的数据和研究。Faggella-Luby和Engel通过回顾研究、模型、趋势和揭露危险的误解,勾勒出了改变天主教学校包容性叙事的路线图。作者强调了所有学习者都有一个教室的优势,在这个教室里,所有学生都能根据每个学生的具体学习优势和挑战接受指导,他们敦促说,如果我们想满足所有学生的需求,那么我们需要把重点从标签上移开,转而设计以学生为中心的教学。