Transformation of Surveillance Society in Postmodern Culture: From ‘Panopticon’ to ‘Synopticon’ and ‘Omniopticon’

Selin Bitirim Okmeydan
{"title":"Transformation of Surveillance Society in Postmodern Culture: From ‘Panopticon’ to ‘Synopticon’ and ‘Omniopticon’","authors":"Selin Bitirim Okmeydan","doi":"10.5824/1309-1581.2017.5.003.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the historical process from modernism to postmodernism, surveillance has changed both as quantitative and qualitative via information and communication technologies that pushing the boundaries, and this change has brought new criticisms together. Asymmetrical surveillance which is defined by panopticon metaphor in modernism, has transformed to omniopticon that is the last point of surveillance in postmodernism. By this AJIT-e: Online Academic Journal of Information Technology 2017-Special Issue/Özel Sayı –Cilt/Vol: 8‐Sayı/Num: 30 DOI: 10.5824/1309‐1581.2017.5.003.x http://www.ajit‐e.org/?menu=pages&p=details_of_article&id=286 46 transformation, control function of power has masked and it has deeply changed. In panoptic surveillance, control function of power is based on external pressure and coerce, but in synopticon and omniopticon, it is based on individual consent and volunteerism. The 'boring control' function of the power in panopticon has turned into a 'hedonist and entertaining' attribute when it comes to the omniopticon. In this study, the structural transformation of surveillance in the process of modernism and postmodernism has been examined by using literature review method, and it is aimed to determine differences between the concepts of panopticon, synopticon and omniopticon. The theoretical infrastructure has been based on the thoughts of the leading figures working in this context. The aim of this study is to explain of the changing surveillance practices with postmodernism in the axis of the postmodern cultural motifs. In this respect, it has been determined that today's surveillance practices develops in harmony with the dynamics of postmodernism. It has been reached the conclusion that the power has been completely hidden its existence in synopticon and omniopticon, and has been reproduced itself, although the existence of power in the panopticon has been known but clearly not seen.","PeriodicalId":244910,"journal":{"name":"AJIT‐e: Online Academic Journal of Information Technology","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJIT‐e: Online Academic Journal of Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5824/1309-1581.2017.5.003.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Within the historical process from modernism to postmodernism, surveillance has changed both as quantitative and qualitative via information and communication technologies that pushing the boundaries, and this change has brought new criticisms together. Asymmetrical surveillance which is defined by panopticon metaphor in modernism, has transformed to omniopticon that is the last point of surveillance in postmodernism. By this AJIT-e: Online Academic Journal of Information Technology 2017-Special Issue/Özel Sayı –Cilt/Vol: 8‐Sayı/Num: 30 DOI: 10.5824/1309‐1581.2017.5.003.x http://www.ajit‐e.org/?menu=pages&p=details_of_article&id=286 46 transformation, control function of power has masked and it has deeply changed. In panoptic surveillance, control function of power is based on external pressure and coerce, but in synopticon and omniopticon, it is based on individual consent and volunteerism. The 'boring control' function of the power in panopticon has turned into a 'hedonist and entertaining' attribute when it comes to the omniopticon. In this study, the structural transformation of surveillance in the process of modernism and postmodernism has been examined by using literature review method, and it is aimed to determine differences between the concepts of panopticon, synopticon and omniopticon. The theoretical infrastructure has been based on the thoughts of the leading figures working in this context. The aim of this study is to explain of the changing surveillance practices with postmodernism in the axis of the postmodern cultural motifs. In this respect, it has been determined that today's surveillance practices develops in harmony with the dynamics of postmodernism. It has been reached the conclusion that the power has been completely hidden its existence in synopticon and omniopticon, and has been reproduced itself, although the existence of power in the panopticon has been known but clearly not seen.
后现代文化中监控社会的转型:从“全景监狱”到“综合监狱”和“全方位监狱”
在从现代主义到后现代主义的历史进程中,通过信息和通信技术突破边界,监控在数量和质量上都发生了变化,这种变化带来了新的批评。现代主义中以panopticon隐喻定义的不对称监视,在后现代主义中转变为全方位监视,这是监视的最后一点。作者:信息技术在线学术杂志2017-特刊/Özel sayyi -Cilt /Vol: 8‐sayyi /Num: 30 DOI: 10.5824/1309‐1581.2017.5.003。X http://www.ajit‐e.org/?menu=pages&p=details_of_article&id=286 46转型,权力的控制功能被掩盖,并发生了深刻的变化。在全景监视中,权力的控制功能是基于外部压力和胁迫,而在全景监视和全景监视中,权力的控制功能是基于个人的同意和自愿。在全景监狱中,权力的“无聊控制”功能在全景监狱中变成了“享乐主义和娱乐”属性。本研究采用文献回顾法考察现代主义和后现代主义过程中监视的结构转变,旨在确定panopticon、synopticon和omniopticon概念之间的差异。理论基础是建立在这一背景下工作的主要人物的思想基础之上的。本研究的目的是在后现代文化母旨的轴心下,以后现代主义解释不断变化的监视实践。在这方面,已经确定今天的监视实践与后现代主义的动态和谐发展。得出的结论是,权力已经完全隐藏了它在synopticon和omniopticon中的存在,并且已经复制了自己,尽管权力在panopticon中的存在已经被知道,但却没有被清楚地看到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信