Comparative Analysis of AlexNet, Resnet-50, and Inception-V3 Models on Masked Face Recognition

Benedicta Nana Esi Nyarko, Wu Bin, Jinzhi Zhou, George Kofi Agordzo, J. Odoom, Ebenezer Koukoyi
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of AlexNet, Resnet-50, and Inception-V3 Models on Masked Face Recognition","authors":"Benedicta Nana Esi Nyarko, Wu Bin, Jinzhi Zhou, George Kofi Agordzo, J. Odoom, Ebenezer Koukoyi","doi":"10.1109/aiiot54504.2022.9817327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic in December 2019, there has been increased interest in developing better facial recognition systems. This stems from the need to protect everyone from the spread of the virus. However, the measures taken to prevent the spread of the virus pose a challenge to security and surveillance systems as existing systems are unable to match faces with masks more efficiently. For this study, a custom dataset was generated due to the unavailability of a large face dataset for masked face recognition, and the existing datasets focused on Caucasians (white race faces) while Aethiopians (black race faces) were neglected. In this study, a comparative analysis was conducted between the AlexNet, ResNet-50, and Inception-V3 models to recognize faces with surgical masks, fabric masks, and N95 masks. The results of the study showed that the CNN models achieve excellent recognition accuracy for masked and unmasked faces. Analysis of the models' performance showed that the AlexNet model achieved 95.7%, ResNet-50 achieved 97.5%, and Inception-V3 also achieved 95.5%. From the study, ResNet-50 performed better than Inception-V3 and AlexNet models in recognizing masked faces.","PeriodicalId":409264,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE World AI IoT Congress (AIIoT)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE World AI IoT Congress (AIIoT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/aiiot54504.2022.9817327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic in December 2019, there has been increased interest in developing better facial recognition systems. This stems from the need to protect everyone from the spread of the virus. However, the measures taken to prevent the spread of the virus pose a challenge to security and surveillance systems as existing systems are unable to match faces with masks more efficiently. For this study, a custom dataset was generated due to the unavailability of a large face dataset for masked face recognition, and the existing datasets focused on Caucasians (white race faces) while Aethiopians (black race faces) were neglected. In this study, a comparative analysis was conducted between the AlexNet, ResNet-50, and Inception-V3 models to recognize faces with surgical masks, fabric masks, and N95 masks. The results of the study showed that the CNN models achieve excellent recognition accuracy for masked and unmasked faces. Analysis of the models' performance showed that the AlexNet model achieved 95.7%, ResNet-50 achieved 97.5%, and Inception-V3 also achieved 95.5%. From the study, ResNet-50 performed better than Inception-V3 and AlexNet models in recognizing masked faces.
AlexNet、Resnet-50和Inception-V3模型在蒙面人脸识别中的比较分析
自2019年12月冠状病毒大流行爆发以来,人们对开发更好的面部识别系统的兴趣越来越大。这源于保护每个人不受病毒传播的需要。然而,为防止病毒传播而采取的措施对安全和监测系统构成了挑战,因为现有系统无法更有效地将人脸与口罩匹配起来。在本研究中,由于无法获得用于蒙面人脸识别的大型人脸数据集,因此生成了一个自定义数据集,并且现有数据集侧重于高加索人(白种人面孔),而埃塞俄比亚人(黑人面孔)被忽略。在本研究中,对AlexNet、ResNet-50和Inception-V3模型进行了外科口罩、织物口罩和N95口罩的人脸识别对比分析。研究结果表明,CNN模型对被遮挡和未被遮挡的人脸都有很好的识别精度。对模型的性能分析表明,AlexNet模型的准确率为95.7%,ResNet-50模型的准确率为97.5%,Inception-V3模型的准确率也为95.5%。从研究中可以看出,ResNet-50在识别蒙面人脸方面的表现优于Inception-V3和AlexNet模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信