Modification of the MPC Omega Model to Predict Primary and Tertiary Creep

M. Haque
{"title":"Modification of the MPC Omega Model to Predict Primary and Tertiary Creep","authors":"M. Haque","doi":"10.1115/pvp2019-93100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The MPC Omega model has become popular in recent years for the prediction of creep deformation. Successful predictions of the tertiary creep for a wide range of materials are available. The Omega model relates the strain as a linear function of the natural logarithm of strain-rate. It is assumed that the primary creep is a short-lived phenomenon and can be neglected. The Omega model is unable to predict the primary creep deformation. Often primary creep is a long-lived phenomenon and cannot be neglected. A mathematical modification can be performed to incorporate the primary creep curve in the Omega model. A common approach is by adding a work hardening function to the original constitutive model. Approaches using power, or exponential, or logarithmic work-hardening function are available. However, it is difficult to discern which function is the best for accurate prediction. In this study, the Omega model is modified to predict the primary and tertiary creep deformation curve by adding a hyperbolic tangent work hardening function. A metamodel incorporating the four modified Omega sub-models (power, exponential, logarithmic and hyperbolic tangent) is developed. The metamodel enables the determination of the most suitable model for a given material and avoids the force fit of a preselected model. Short, medium, and long-term creep deformation data for alloy P91 (pipe) and G91 (plate) at two isotherms of 600°C and 650°C are used to calibrate the metamodel. The data include five stress levels ranging from 70 to 160 MPa including creep life from 233 to 1.1 × 105 hrs. A detail calibration process is provided. A numerical analysis is performed to compare the four submodels. It is observed that the selection of the most suitable function depends on the loading condition and material properties. Based on the analysis, a recommendation to select the suitable work-hardening function to predict the primary and tertiary creep deformation curve is presented.","PeriodicalId":428760,"journal":{"name":"Volume 6A: Materials and Fabrication","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 6A: Materials and Fabrication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2019-93100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The MPC Omega model has become popular in recent years for the prediction of creep deformation. Successful predictions of the tertiary creep for a wide range of materials are available. The Omega model relates the strain as a linear function of the natural logarithm of strain-rate. It is assumed that the primary creep is a short-lived phenomenon and can be neglected. The Omega model is unable to predict the primary creep deformation. Often primary creep is a long-lived phenomenon and cannot be neglected. A mathematical modification can be performed to incorporate the primary creep curve in the Omega model. A common approach is by adding a work hardening function to the original constitutive model. Approaches using power, or exponential, or logarithmic work-hardening function are available. However, it is difficult to discern which function is the best for accurate prediction. In this study, the Omega model is modified to predict the primary and tertiary creep deformation curve by adding a hyperbolic tangent work hardening function. A metamodel incorporating the four modified Omega sub-models (power, exponential, logarithmic and hyperbolic tangent) is developed. The metamodel enables the determination of the most suitable model for a given material and avoids the force fit of a preselected model. Short, medium, and long-term creep deformation data for alloy P91 (pipe) and G91 (plate) at two isotherms of 600°C and 650°C are used to calibrate the metamodel. The data include five stress levels ranging from 70 to 160 MPa including creep life from 233 to 1.1 × 105 hrs. A detail calibration process is provided. A numerical analysis is performed to compare the four submodels. It is observed that the selection of the most suitable function depends on the loading condition and material properties. Based on the analysis, a recommendation to select the suitable work-hardening function to predict the primary and tertiary creep deformation curve is presented.
修正MPC Omega模型预测原生和原生蠕变
近年来,MPC - Omega模型已成为预测蠕变的一种流行方法。三级蠕变的成功预测范围广泛的材料是可用的。Omega模型将应变作为应变率自然对数的线性函数。假定原始蠕变是一个短暂的现象,可以忽略不计。欧米茄模型不能预测初始蠕变。原生蠕变通常是一个长期存在的现象,不能被忽视。可以进行数学修改以将原始蠕变曲线纳入Omega模型。一种常见的方法是在原来的本构模型中加入加工硬化函数。使用幂、指数或对数加工硬化函数的方法是可用的。然而,很难辨别哪个函数是最适合准确预测的。在本研究中,通过添加双曲切线加工硬化函数,对Omega模型进行了修正,以预测初级和三级蠕变曲线。建立了包含四个修正的Omega子模型(幂、指数、对数和双曲正切)的元模型。元模型能够确定最适合给定材料的模型,并避免预选模型的力拟合。采用合金P91(管)和G91(板)在600°C和650°C两个等温线下的短、中、长期蠕变数据对元模型进行了标定。数据包括70 ~ 160 MPa的5个应力水平,蠕变寿命为233 ~ 1.1 × 105小时。给出了详细的校准过程。通过数值分析对四个子模型进行了比较。观察到,最合适函数的选择取决于加载条件和材料性能。在此基础上,提出了选择合适的加工硬化函数来预测一次和第三次蠕变曲线的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信