Effectiveness of Qualitative Research Methods: Interviews and Diaries

Wafaa Abdullah Alamri
{"title":"Effectiveness of Qualitative Research Methods: Interviews and Diaries","authors":"Wafaa Abdullah Alamri","doi":"10.11114/IJECS.V2I1.4302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aims to explore the effectiveness of qualitative research methods. The qualitative research method has been opted after a thorough literature examination. The concept of triangulation and the process of multi-method qualitative research on error correction and students’ motivation were also examined. The results discovered more about the participants as he or she reads their diaries containing their detailed opinions and feelings. Subjectivity is another remarkable feature of diaries for learners to improve their writing skills and to use diverse vocabulary to express their views and emotions. Reviewing the information within a diary helps people to judge their behaviour and others, towards certain events. It was depicted that the triangulation method assists to have a more in-depth understanding of the recorded entries in the diaries by using semi-structured interviews. Both approaches were found to comprise of advantages and disadvantage, where the selection is based on the nature of the study and the understanding of the researcher. The results of the present study help guide the researcher in determining the specific choice of study.","PeriodicalId":166482,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of English and Cultural Studies","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of English and Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11114/IJECS.V2I1.4302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The present study aims to explore the effectiveness of qualitative research methods. The qualitative research method has been opted after a thorough literature examination. The concept of triangulation and the process of multi-method qualitative research on error correction and students’ motivation were also examined. The results discovered more about the participants as he or she reads their diaries containing their detailed opinions and feelings. Subjectivity is another remarkable feature of diaries for learners to improve their writing skills and to use diverse vocabulary to express their views and emotions. Reviewing the information within a diary helps people to judge their behaviour and others, towards certain events. It was depicted that the triangulation method assists to have a more in-depth understanding of the recorded entries in the diaries by using semi-structured interviews. Both approaches were found to comprise of advantages and disadvantage, where the selection is based on the nature of the study and the understanding of the researcher. The results of the present study help guide the researcher in determining the specific choice of study.
质性研究方法的有效性:访谈与日记
本研究旨在探讨质性研究方法的有效性。在进行了全面的文献查阅后,选择了定性研究方法。本文还探讨了三角测量的概念,以及纠错与学生动机的多方法定性研究过程。结果发现,当参与者阅读他们的日记时,他们会更多地了解自己的观点和感受。主观性是日记的另一个显著特点,它可以帮助学习者提高写作技巧,用多样化的词汇来表达自己的观点和情感。回顾日记中的信息有助于人们判断自己和他人对某些事件的行为。分析认为,三角法通过半结构化访谈,有助于更深入地了解日记中记录的条目。两种方法都被发现包括优点和缺点,其中选择是基于研究的性质和研究人员的理解。本研究的结果有助于指导研究者确定研究的具体选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信