Automatic Discovery of Controversial Legal Judgments by an Entropy-Based Measurement (S)

Jing Zhou, Shan Leng, Fang Wang, Hansheng Wang
{"title":"Automatic Discovery of Controversial Legal Judgments by an Entropy-Based Measurement (S)","authors":"Jing Zhou, Shan Leng, Fang Wang, Hansheng Wang","doi":"10.18293/seke2023-035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"—The judgment of controversial cases has always been an important judicial issue, but it is not easy to discover them in practice. In this paper, based on 1,361,354 legal instruments data collected from China Judgments Online, we adopt a deep learning framework to classify 147 different kinds of crimes. The proposed method has three critical steps: 1) We adopt a deep learning model to predict crime categorization; 2) With the trained model, each case is given a score vector which represents the probability that it belongs to each crime; 3) With the probability score, we develop an entropy-based index to measure the controversy of each case. We find that the larger the entropy, the more inconsistent the result given by the model based on the first instance judgment. To verify the proposed entropy measure, we provide 1) two-sided evidence based on second instance judgments; 2) comparison with some baseline models. Both confirm the practical usefulness of the entropy measure. Our results indicate that the proposed framework has an ability to discover potentially controversial cases. It should be noted that the goal of this study is not to substitute the model result for the judge’s decision, but to provide a guiding reference for the judicial practice of sentencing.","PeriodicalId":291002,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18293/seke2023-035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

—The judgment of controversial cases has always been an important judicial issue, but it is not easy to discover them in practice. In this paper, based on 1,361,354 legal instruments data collected from China Judgments Online, we adopt a deep learning framework to classify 147 different kinds of crimes. The proposed method has three critical steps: 1) We adopt a deep learning model to predict crime categorization; 2) With the trained model, each case is given a score vector which represents the probability that it belongs to each crime; 3) With the probability score, we develop an entropy-based index to measure the controversy of each case. We find that the larger the entropy, the more inconsistent the result given by the model based on the first instance judgment. To verify the proposed entropy measure, we provide 1) two-sided evidence based on second instance judgments; 2) comparison with some baseline models. Both confirm the practical usefulness of the entropy measure. Our results indicate that the proposed framework has an ability to discover potentially controversial cases. It should be noted that the goal of this study is not to substitute the model result for the judge’s decision, but to provide a guiding reference for the judicial practice of sentencing.
基于熵的法律判决自动发现(S)
——争议案件的判决一直是一个重要的司法问题,但在实践中却不容易发现。本文基于中国裁判文书网收集的1361354份法律文书数据,采用深度学习框架对147种不同类型的犯罪进行分类。该方法有三个关键步骤:1)采用深度学习模型预测犯罪分类;2)使用训练好的模型,给每个案例一个分数向量,表示它属于每个犯罪的概率;3)通过概率得分,我们建立了一个基于熵的指标来衡量每个案例的争议性。我们发现,熵越大,基于初审判断的模型给出的结果越不一致。为了验证所提出的熵测度,我们提供了1)基于二审判决的双面证据;2)与一些基线模型的比较。两者都证实了熵测度的实用性。我们的结果表明,提出的框架有能力发现潜在的有争议的情况。需要注意的是,本研究的目的不是用模型结果代替法官的判决,而是为量刑的司法实践提供指导性参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信