Tools for MHD simulation of hot dense plasma

S. Semushin, B. Etlicher
{"title":"Tools for MHD simulation of hot dense plasma","authors":"S. Semushin, B. Etlicher","doi":"10.1109/BEAMS.1998.822412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The complexity of physical problems in plasma demands special tools for its analysis. The primary source of data is, of coarse, the physical experiment. But, sufficiently complete comprehension of physical phenomenon is actually impossible without the numerical simulation, which is more and more often named as computational experiment. Moreover, computational experiment usually provides more complete set of data, which becomes credible only after verification by experiment. The processes under consideration (such as different Z-pinches, plasma opening switches-POS, plasma focus and others) have some common features. Fist of all, they are non-stationary and subjected to divers instabilities. Another common feature is a big difference in time and spatial scales, and small local details are very often significant for global process development. This means, that some kind of adaptation is inevitable for numerical simulations. Traditional lagrangian approach can be also considered as adaptation, based on the mass, but it is not applicable to the problems with high level of convection or mixing. Two numerical methods for MHD plasma simulation and corresponding codes are presented here. The first code ASTRE uses original adaptive mesh refinement algorithm, the other one, Z+ is based on classical arbitrary lagrangian-eulerian algorithm. These two approaches are complimentary. Each of them has its own advantages and specific application domains, but each of them covers the majority of the problems under consideration.","PeriodicalId":410823,"journal":{"name":"12th International Conference on High-Power Particle Beams. BEAMS'98. Proceedings (Cat. No.98EX103)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"12th International Conference on High-Power Particle Beams. BEAMS'98. Proceedings (Cat. No.98EX103)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BEAMS.1998.822412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The complexity of physical problems in plasma demands special tools for its analysis. The primary source of data is, of coarse, the physical experiment. But, sufficiently complete comprehension of physical phenomenon is actually impossible without the numerical simulation, which is more and more often named as computational experiment. Moreover, computational experiment usually provides more complete set of data, which becomes credible only after verification by experiment. The processes under consideration (such as different Z-pinches, plasma opening switches-POS, plasma focus and others) have some common features. Fist of all, they are non-stationary and subjected to divers instabilities. Another common feature is a big difference in time and spatial scales, and small local details are very often significant for global process development. This means, that some kind of adaptation is inevitable for numerical simulations. Traditional lagrangian approach can be also considered as adaptation, based on the mass, but it is not applicable to the problems with high level of convection or mixing. Two numerical methods for MHD plasma simulation and corresponding codes are presented here. The first code ASTRE uses original adaptive mesh refinement algorithm, the other one, Z+ is based on classical arbitrary lagrangian-eulerian algorithm. These two approaches are complimentary. Each of them has its own advantages and specific application domains, but each of them covers the majority of the problems under consideration.
热致密等离子体MHD模拟工具
等离子体物理问题的复杂性需要特殊的分析工具。粗略地说,数据的主要来源是物理实验。但是,要充分完整地理解物理现象,实际上离不开数值模拟,而数值模拟越来越多地被称为计算实验。此外,计算实验通常提供更完整的数据集,只有经过实验验证才可信。所考虑的过程(如不同的z夹脚,等离子体打开开关- pos,等离子体聚焦等)有一些共同的特点。首先,它们是非平稳的,具有多种不稳定性。另一个共同的特征是时间和空间尺度上的巨大差异,小的局部细节对于全局过程开发通常非常重要。这意味着,对于数值模拟来说,某种适应是不可避免的。传统的拉格朗日方法也可以认为是一种基于质量的自适应方法,但它不适用于对流或混合程度高的问题。本文给出了两种MHD等离子体模拟的数值方法和相应的代码。第一个代码ASTRE采用原始的自适应网格细化算法,另一个代码Z+基于经典的任意拉格朗日-欧拉算法。这两种方法是互补的。每种方法都有自己的优点和特定的应用领域,但每种方法都涵盖了所考虑的大多数问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信