Electro-Physiological Pattern And Severity Grading of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Israt Jahan, K. Islam, Md. Shahidul Islam, Sara Tanzila, Tuhfie Jannat, M. Habib
{"title":"Electro-Physiological Pattern And Severity Grading of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome","authors":"Israt Jahan, K. Islam, Md. Shahidul Islam, Sara Tanzila, Tuhfie Jannat, M. Habib","doi":"10.3329/jdmc.v30i2.56921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is a constellation of symptoms and signs caused by entrapment of the median nerve at the wrist. Nerve Conduction Study (NCS) serve as an objective supplementary modality in the diagnosis of CTS and is used for severity assessment with high degree of sensitivity and specificity. Severity assessment is a crucial step for defining prognosis of CTS.\nMethodology: The study was a hospital based observational cross sectional study and was conducted in the department of Neurology, DMCH on 50 patients with clinical diagnosis of CTS with electro-physiological confirmation from July, 2017 to June, 2019. Equal number of age and sex matched healthy people were included in the study. All the cases had clinical evaluation and standardized electrophysiological studies of upper limbs using the same protocol.\nResult: The mean age of CTS patients was 43.06 (±10.54) years and majority of the them were female (74%). In patients with CTS, electrophysiological study of median nerve revealed the following mean value MDL=5.98± 1.63 ms, SDL=4.24± 0.59 ms, CMAP = 6.16± 3.22mv, MNCV = 54.46± 6.76 m/s, SNAP = 11.65± 13.42 ìV, In Comparison to mild to moderate CTS other than CMAP, all other parameters have significant changes. In case of moderate to severe grade of CTS, all the parameters have significant changes. Amongst the 50 CTS patients, there was bilateral involvement in 21 (42%) and unilateral involvement in 29 (58%) patient. According to electrophysiological grading, 15 (21%) were in mild group; 35 (49%) were in moderate group and 21 (30%) were in severe group. According to the clinical grading, 31 (44%) were in mild group, 25 (35%) in moderate and 15 (21%) were in severe group.\nConclusion: From this study it could be concluded that CTS is more common in female. Sensory symptoms and dominant (right) hand involvement were more common. NCS provides additional and independent objective evidence in the diagnosis and severity assessment of CTS patients. Assessment of severity in CTS patients is a crucial step for defining prognosis and therapeutic measures.\nJ Dhaka Med Coll. 2021; 30(2) : 161-166","PeriodicalId":320976,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dhaka Medical College","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dhaka Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jdmc.v30i2.56921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is a constellation of symptoms and signs caused by entrapment of the median nerve at the wrist. Nerve Conduction Study (NCS) serve as an objective supplementary modality in the diagnosis of CTS and is used for severity assessment with high degree of sensitivity and specificity. Severity assessment is a crucial step for defining prognosis of CTS. Methodology: The study was a hospital based observational cross sectional study and was conducted in the department of Neurology, DMCH on 50 patients with clinical diagnosis of CTS with electro-physiological confirmation from July, 2017 to June, 2019. Equal number of age and sex matched healthy people were included in the study. All the cases had clinical evaluation and standardized electrophysiological studies of upper limbs using the same protocol. Result: The mean age of CTS patients was 43.06 (±10.54) years and majority of the them were female (74%). In patients with CTS, electrophysiological study of median nerve revealed the following mean value MDL=5.98± 1.63 ms, SDL=4.24± 0.59 ms, CMAP = 6.16± 3.22mv, MNCV = 54.46± 6.76 m/s, SNAP = 11.65± 13.42 ìV, In Comparison to mild to moderate CTS other than CMAP, all other parameters have significant changes. In case of moderate to severe grade of CTS, all the parameters have significant changes. Amongst the 50 CTS patients, there was bilateral involvement in 21 (42%) and unilateral involvement in 29 (58%) patient. According to electrophysiological grading, 15 (21%) were in mild group; 35 (49%) were in moderate group and 21 (30%) were in severe group. According to the clinical grading, 31 (44%) were in mild group, 25 (35%) in moderate and 15 (21%) were in severe group. Conclusion: From this study it could be concluded that CTS is more common in female. Sensory symptoms and dominant (right) hand involvement were more common. NCS provides additional and independent objective evidence in the diagnosis and severity assessment of CTS patients. Assessment of severity in CTS patients is a crucial step for defining prognosis and therapeutic measures. J Dhaka Med Coll. 2021; 30(2) : 161-166
腕管综合征的电生理模式及严重程度分级
背景:腕管综合征(Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, CTS)是由腕部正中神经卡压引起的一系列症状和体征。神经传导研究(neural Conduction Study, NCS)作为CTS诊断的客观辅助手段,具有高度的敏感性和特异性,可用于评估CTS的严重程度。严重程度评估是确定CTS预后的关键步骤。方法:本研究为基于医院的观察性横断面研究,于2017年7月至2019年6月在DMCH神经内科对50例经电生理证实的临床诊断为CTS的患者进行研究。同样数量的年龄和性别匹配的健康人群被纳入研究。所有病例均采用相同的方案进行了临床评估和上肢电生理标准化研究。结果:CTS患者平均年龄43.06(±10.54)岁,以女性居多(74%)。CTS患者正中神经电生理研究显示MDL=5.98±1.63 ms, SDL=4.24±0.59 ms, CMAP = 6.16±3.22mv, MNCV = 54.46±6.76 m/s, SNAP = 11.65±13.42 ìV,与CMAP以外的轻中度CTS相比,其他参数均有显著变化。在中重度CTS情况下,各参数均有显著变化。在50例CTS患者中,21例(42%)患者双侧受累,29例(58%)患者单侧受累。根据电生理分级,轻度组15例(21%);中度组35例(49%),重度组21例(30%)。根据临床分级,轻度组31例(44%),中度组25例(35%),重度组15例(21%)。结论:CTS多见于女性。感觉症状和主手(右手)受累更为常见。NCS为CTS患者的诊断和严重程度评估提供了额外的、独立的客观证据。评估CTS患者的严重程度是确定预后和治疗措施的关键步骤。达卡医学院,2021;30(2): 161-166
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信