The Glymphatic System and New Etiopathogenic Hypotheses Concerning Glaucoma Based on Pilot Study on Glaucoma Patients Who Underwent Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT)

D. Paoli, L. Michelin, F. Vassallo, Luigi Ciullo, P. Brusini, L. Torelli
{"title":"The Glymphatic System and New Etiopathogenic Hypotheses Concerning Glaucoma Based on Pilot Study on Glaucoma Patients Who Underwent Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT)","authors":"D. Paoli, L. Michelin, F. Vassallo, Luigi Ciullo, P. Brusini, L. Torelli","doi":"10.54646/bijcroo.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Malfunction of the lymphatic or glymphatic system recently shown in the brain, seems to play an important role in central neurodegenerative pathologies through a build-up of neurotoxins. Recent studies have shown functional links between aqueous humour and cerebrospinal fluid via the glymphatic system, offering new perspectives and unifying theories on the vascular, biomechanical and biochemical causes of chronic and open angle glaucoma (POAG). The aim of this randomized pilot study is to compare the variations in intraocular pressure between 20 cases of compensated POAG under pharmacological therapy and 20 glaucoma patients undergoing osteopathic treatment, hypothesizing that this manipulation can influence intraocular pressure. Materials and Methods The 40 patients under study, all covered by the Helsinki convention, were randomly divided into 2 groups (treated group or TG and control group or CG). The 40 patients were chosen from compensated glaucoma sufferers, who required neither changes in therapy nor operations which would affect their eye pressure which was measured both before and after manipulative osteopathic treatment scheduled into 4 sessions at intervals of 7.3 and 150 days, then compared with the control group (20 patients) who were undergoing pharmacological treatment only. Results The average IOP in the TG was compared with the CG throughout the entire treatment cycle showing a statistically inconclusive reduction in the right eye RE P-value (0.0561), while for the left eye a significant effect was shown LE (0.0073). The difference between the reduction in IOP between TG and CG was observable 10 months after the first session or rather 5 months after the last, and demonstrable during a check-up 13 months after the beginning of the study, or rather 8 months in absence of treatment with a highly significant statistical p-value (0.000434). Conclusions This study has shown that manipulative osteopathic treatment can affect intraocular pressure after each session and that the pressure is significantly lower even months after the last treatment session.","PeriodicalId":101752,"journal":{"name":"BOHR International Journal of Current Research in Optometry and Ophthalmology","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BOHR International Journal of Current Research in Optometry and Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54646/bijcroo.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Malfunction of the lymphatic or glymphatic system recently shown in the brain, seems to play an important role in central neurodegenerative pathologies through a build-up of neurotoxins. Recent studies have shown functional links between aqueous humour and cerebrospinal fluid via the glymphatic system, offering new perspectives and unifying theories on the vascular, biomechanical and biochemical causes of chronic and open angle glaucoma (POAG). The aim of this randomized pilot study is to compare the variations in intraocular pressure between 20 cases of compensated POAG under pharmacological therapy and 20 glaucoma patients undergoing osteopathic treatment, hypothesizing that this manipulation can influence intraocular pressure. Materials and Methods The 40 patients under study, all covered by the Helsinki convention, were randomly divided into 2 groups (treated group or TG and control group or CG). The 40 patients were chosen from compensated glaucoma sufferers, who required neither changes in therapy nor operations which would affect their eye pressure which was measured both before and after manipulative osteopathic treatment scheduled into 4 sessions at intervals of 7.3 and 150 days, then compared with the control group (20 patients) who were undergoing pharmacological treatment only. Results The average IOP in the TG was compared with the CG throughout the entire treatment cycle showing a statistically inconclusive reduction in the right eye RE P-value (0.0561), while for the left eye a significant effect was shown LE (0.0073). The difference between the reduction in IOP between TG and CG was observable 10 months after the first session or rather 5 months after the last, and demonstrable during a check-up 13 months after the beginning of the study, or rather 8 months in absence of treatment with a highly significant statistical p-value (0.000434). Conclusions This study has shown that manipulative osteopathic treatment can affect intraocular pressure after each session and that the pressure is significantly lower even months after the last treatment session.
青光眼的淋巴系统及新的发病假说——基于青光眼骨疗法(OMT)患者的初步研究
目的最近在大脑中显示的淋巴或淋巴系统的功能障碍,似乎通过神经毒素的积累在中枢神经退行性病变中起重要作用。近年来的研究表明,脑脊液通过淋巴系统与脑脊液之间存在功能联系,为慢性开角型青光眼(POAG)的血管、生物力学和生化原因提供了新的视角和统一的理论。本随机先导研究的目的是比较20例代偿POAG患者在药物治疗下和20例青光眼患者在骨疗法治疗下的眼压变化,假设骨疗法可以影响眼压。材料与方法将40例纳入赫尔辛基公约的患者随机分为治疗组(TG)和对照组(CG)。这40名患者选自代偿性青光眼患者,他们既不需要改变治疗方法,也不需要进行会影响他们眼压的手术。眼压是在手法整骨疗法治疗前后测量的,治疗前后分为4期,间隔7.3天和150天,然后与对照组(20名患者)进行比较。结果TG组与CG组在整个治疗周期内的平均IOP比较,右眼RE p值降低(0.0561),而左眼RE p值降低(0.0073),差异无统计学意义。TG和CG之间IOP降低的差异在第一次治疗后10个月或最后一次治疗后5个月可以观察到,在研究开始后13个月的检查中可以证明,或者在没有治疗的情况下8个月,具有高度显著的统计学p值(0.000434)。结论:本研究显示手法整骨疗法可影响每次治疗后的眼压,甚至在最后一次治疗数月后眼压显著降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信