Politics of accounting evidence in privatising telecommunications in Sri Lanka

G. Gunatilake, B. Lord, Keith Dixon
{"title":"Politics of accounting evidence in privatising telecommunications in Sri Lanka","authors":"G. Gunatilake, B. Lord, Keith Dixon","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-09-2019-4160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper illustrates the socio-political nature of accountings, referring to the partial privatisation of the monopoly telecommunications organisation in a lower-middle-income country.Design/methodology/approachActor-network theory and an ANTi-history approach are used to trace circumstances and occurrences. Empirical materials include official documents, print media and retrospective interviews with organisation employees ten years on from the privatisation.FindingsProponents of privatisation used retrospectively constructed historical accounts to problematise the natural monopoly of telecommunications and the government organisation administering it. A restructuring programme followed. Proponents addressed controversies pertaining to the programme thus garnering widespread support for complex and controversial changes. Proponents produced and reproduced accounting artefacts as evidence in these processes of history reconstruction, consequent changes and restoring stability to telecommunications in its reconfigured commercial domain. The proponents used selective, controversial accounting evidence to problematise the government organisation's existence, then to mobilise various actors to reduce and close the controversies previously aroused and reinstate stability in a partially privatised telecommunications company. Although no longer having a monopoly this company still dominates. Dissenters did the same but with little success.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings demonstrate the importance of tracing the socio-political process of arriving at the dominant outcome about the past. This assists in making sense of present circumstances and re-imagining the future.Originality/valueThe study demonstrates that, during controversial circumstances, taken-for-granted history, as well as what is thought to have not existed in the past, support the dominant network in gaining advantage over their opponents and black-boxing their perspectives of how things should be.","PeriodicalId":132341,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-09-2019-4160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper illustrates the socio-political nature of accountings, referring to the partial privatisation of the monopoly telecommunications organisation in a lower-middle-income country.Design/methodology/approachActor-network theory and an ANTi-history approach are used to trace circumstances and occurrences. Empirical materials include official documents, print media and retrospective interviews with organisation employees ten years on from the privatisation.FindingsProponents of privatisation used retrospectively constructed historical accounts to problematise the natural monopoly of telecommunications and the government organisation administering it. A restructuring programme followed. Proponents addressed controversies pertaining to the programme thus garnering widespread support for complex and controversial changes. Proponents produced and reproduced accounting artefacts as evidence in these processes of history reconstruction, consequent changes and restoring stability to telecommunications in its reconfigured commercial domain. The proponents used selective, controversial accounting evidence to problematise the government organisation's existence, then to mobilise various actors to reduce and close the controversies previously aroused and reinstate stability in a partially privatised telecommunications company. Although no longer having a monopoly this company still dominates. Dissenters did the same but with little success.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings demonstrate the importance of tracing the socio-political process of arriving at the dominant outcome about the past. This assists in making sense of present circumstances and re-imagining the future.Originality/valueThe study demonstrates that, during controversial circumstances, taken-for-granted history, as well as what is thought to have not existed in the past, support the dominant network in gaining advantage over their opponents and black-boxing their perspectives of how things should be.
斯里兰卡电信私有化中的会计证据政治
本文说明了会计的社会政治性质,指的是在一个中低收入国家垄断电信组织的部分私有化。设计/方法论/方法行动者网络理论和反历史方法被用来追踪环境和事件。实证材料包括官方文件、印刷媒体和对私有化十年后组织员工的回顾性访谈。研究结果:私有化的支持者利用回顾性的历史描述,对电信业的自然垄断和管理电信业的政府机构提出了质疑。随后制订了改组方案。支持者解决了与该方案有关的争议,从而获得了对复杂和有争议的变化的广泛支持。支持者制作和复制会计人工制品,作为这些历史重建过程的证据,随之而来的变化以及在重新配置的商业领域中恢复电信的稳定性。支持者使用选择性的、有争议的会计证据来质疑这个政府机构的存在,然后动员各种行动者来减少和结束之前引发的争议,并恢复这家部分私有化的电信公司的稳定。这家公司虽然不再垄断,但仍占支配地位。持不同政见者也做了同样的事情,但收效甚微。研究局限/启示研究结果表明,追踪社会政治过程对于得出关于过去的主要结果的重要性。这有助于理解当前的情况和重新想象未来。独创性/价值研究表明,在有争议的情况下,被认为是理所当然的历史,以及过去被认为不存在的东西,支持主导网络获得优于对手的优势,并对事物应该如何发展的观点进行黑盒化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信