Concepts for the Risk-Based Regulation of Clinical Research on Medicines and Medical Devices

M. Hartmann, F. Hartmann-Vareilles
{"title":"Concepts for the Risk-Based Regulation of Clinical Research on Medicines and Medical Devices","authors":"M. Hartmann, F. Hartmann-Vareilles","doi":"10.1177/0092861512453574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2010, discussions about more risk-proportionate trial authorization and supervision procedures gain momentum in the European Union and the United States. This article provides an overview of the current situation and analyses existing proposals for the risk-based assessment and categorization of clinical research. Experiences gained so far with the risk-based categorization and classification of trials and products in the pharmaceuticals and medical devices sector are described: they indicate that strict trial categorization systems would add burden to the whole process and could deliver benefit only within a very flexible regulatory framework. In contrast, partial exemptions from regulatory requirements for well-defined types of trials may respond better to the current expectations of stakeholders. For Europe, such exemptions could be adopted in a custom-made manner with the objective of facilitating the conduct of large, simple, evidence-building clinical trials as well as of patient-focused trials in situations of recognized unmet medical need.","PeriodicalId":391574,"journal":{"name":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0092861512453574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Since 2010, discussions about more risk-proportionate trial authorization and supervision procedures gain momentum in the European Union and the United States. This article provides an overview of the current situation and analyses existing proposals for the risk-based assessment and categorization of clinical research. Experiences gained so far with the risk-based categorization and classification of trials and products in the pharmaceuticals and medical devices sector are described: they indicate that strict trial categorization systems would add burden to the whole process and could deliver benefit only within a very flexible regulatory framework. In contrast, partial exemptions from regulatory requirements for well-defined types of trials may respond better to the current expectations of stakeholders. For Europe, such exemptions could be adopted in a custom-made manner with the objective of facilitating the conduct of large, simple, evidence-building clinical trials as well as of patient-focused trials in situations of recognized unmet medical need.
基于风险的药品和医疗器械临床研究监管概念
自2010年以来,在欧盟和美国,关于更符合风险比例的试验授权和监管程序的讨论愈演愈烈。本文概述了目前的情况,并分析了基于风险的临床研究评估和分类的现有建议。本文描述了迄今为止在药品和医疗器械部门对试验和产品进行基于风险的分类和分类方面取得的经验:这些经验表明,严格的试验分类制度将给整个过程增加负担,只有在非常灵活的监管框架内才能带来好处。相比之下,对定义明确的试验类型的监管要求的部分豁免可能更符合利益相关者的当前期望。对欧洲来说,这种豁免可以以定制的方式加以采用,目的是促进进行大规模、简单、建立证据的临床试验,以及在公认的医疗需求未得到满足的情况下进行以病人为重点的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信