Comparing the dynamic behavior between LFSRs and counting techniques

R. Seireg, A. Vacroux
{"title":"Comparing the dynamic behavior between LFSRs and counting techniques","authors":"R. Seireg, A. Vacroux","doi":"10.1109/NRSC.1996.551425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transition counting is one of the schemes which is used for testing digital circuits. A relation for the aliasing error probability has been deduced which depends on the length of the input pattern. Previously, we have proved that the final value for aliasing error probability for both linear and counting techniques are similar. However, the practical results indicate that the linear technique has a better performance than the counting technique. We study the dynamic behavior for the counting technique. The results are discussed and compared with the results obtained from the linear technique which supports the empirical and practical conclusions for the superiority of the LFSR.","PeriodicalId":127585,"journal":{"name":"Thirteenth National Radio Science Conference. NRSC '96","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thirteenth National Radio Science Conference. NRSC '96","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NRSC.1996.551425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transition counting is one of the schemes which is used for testing digital circuits. A relation for the aliasing error probability has been deduced which depends on the length of the input pattern. Previously, we have proved that the final value for aliasing error probability for both linear and counting techniques are similar. However, the practical results indicate that the linear technique has a better performance than the counting technique. We study the dynamic behavior for the counting technique. The results are discussed and compared with the results obtained from the linear technique which supports the empirical and practical conclusions for the superiority of the LFSR.
比较lfsr和计数技术的动态行为
跃迁计数是测试数字电路的一种方法。推导了混叠误差概率与输入模式长度的关系。以前,我们已经证明了线性技术和计数技术的混叠误差概率的最终值是相似的。然而,实际结果表明,线性技术比计数技术具有更好的性能。我们研究了计数技术的动态行为。将所得结果与线性方法所得结果进行了讨论和比较,支持了LFSR优越性的经验和实践结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信