Determinants of Bank Business Risk According to Risk Based Approach

K. Haryakusuma
{"title":"Determinants of Bank Business Risk According to Risk Based Approach","authors":"K. Haryakusuma","doi":"10.2991/aebmr.k.200131.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"finance the external process because Indonesia is using banking system [3]. The company debt will possibly make them facing financial distress. In other words, real factors are fragile against the performance of the banking industry. The high dependence of Indonesia citizens towards banking services in Indonesia is reaching 77.9%. Compared to the other financial institutions, rural banks is 1.3%, Insurance Company is 10.8%, Pension Fund is 2.8%, Corporate Financing is 6.8% and the other non-bank institutions is (0.9%) [4]. Based on the fact, people in Indonesia still prefer to banking sector rather than the other capital market activity. Accordingly, the banking industry is required having good corporate governance to keep the credibility that supports to economic stability. In response to the trustworthiness from society in Indonesia, 80% 90% fund that bank has compiled are from third party fund. The source of bank funding is from third party fund obtained through banking products such as from saving deposit, demand deposit and time deposit. In 2013, the percentage amount of third party fund is 89.62%, dominated by demand deposit and time deposit [6]. The higher reliance from banking customers on third party fund proportion would increase the risks for bank management to carry out the social fund. To keep the society trustworthiness, a prudent principle must be implemented in the banking industry because it relates to the business sustainability. The banking industry in Indonesia has grown significantly, characterized by a number of banks and banking offices. The growing industry in banking sectors in Indonesia was an impact of Package of Bank Indonesia Deregulation on October 27, 1988 which is known as Pakto 88 [7]. The aims of the reforms were to inject a greater level of competition into banking sector and to increase credit availability throughout the country [8]. Pakto 88 had triggered the banking liberalization in Indonesia. Banking liberalization eased the restriction of bank establishment, consequently a year after this term applied, the number of banks and offices were growing significantly. The high level of rapid competition in banking industry would lead the banks to take an excessive risk because of the difficulty to predict the phenomenon in a rapid competition [9]. Bank is a financial institution that manages money to be the main object of its operations. Because of that, bank has Abstract—Banks have important role on the economy of Indonesia. With a fully regulated principle, Banking Sectors in Indonesia concern to keep in a good performance according to Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 13 / 1 / PBI / 2011 which emphasize on risk-based approach. Therefore, this paper aims to examine the factors affecting commercial banks business risk listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange. Those factors consist of risk profile (credit risk, liquidity risk, and interest rate risk), good corporate governance, earnings, and capital. The samples used in this research are 26 commercial banks listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange during research period since 2011 to 2013. This research uses multiple linear regression analysis. The result of the findings shows that credit risk has effect against business risk, while liquidity risk does not have effect against it. The rate of interest risk has effect against business risk. Good corporate governance does not have effect against business risk. Earnings have significant effect against business risk. Capital does not have effect against business risk. Hence, the implication of the research is that commercial banks business risk is affected by three factors of risk-based bank rating (credit risk, interest rate risk, and earnings).","PeriodicalId":365232,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd Global Conference On Business, Management, and Entrepreneurship (GCBME 2018)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd Global Conference On Business, Management, and Entrepreneurship (GCBME 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200131.023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

finance the external process because Indonesia is using banking system [3]. The company debt will possibly make them facing financial distress. In other words, real factors are fragile against the performance of the banking industry. The high dependence of Indonesia citizens towards banking services in Indonesia is reaching 77.9%. Compared to the other financial institutions, rural banks is 1.3%, Insurance Company is 10.8%, Pension Fund is 2.8%, Corporate Financing is 6.8% and the other non-bank institutions is (0.9%) [4]. Based on the fact, people in Indonesia still prefer to banking sector rather than the other capital market activity. Accordingly, the banking industry is required having good corporate governance to keep the credibility that supports to economic stability. In response to the trustworthiness from society in Indonesia, 80% 90% fund that bank has compiled are from third party fund. The source of bank funding is from third party fund obtained through banking products such as from saving deposit, demand deposit and time deposit. In 2013, the percentage amount of third party fund is 89.62%, dominated by demand deposit and time deposit [6]. The higher reliance from banking customers on third party fund proportion would increase the risks for bank management to carry out the social fund. To keep the society trustworthiness, a prudent principle must be implemented in the banking industry because it relates to the business sustainability. The banking industry in Indonesia has grown significantly, characterized by a number of banks and banking offices. The growing industry in banking sectors in Indonesia was an impact of Package of Bank Indonesia Deregulation on October 27, 1988 which is known as Pakto 88 [7]. The aims of the reforms were to inject a greater level of competition into banking sector and to increase credit availability throughout the country [8]. Pakto 88 had triggered the banking liberalization in Indonesia. Banking liberalization eased the restriction of bank establishment, consequently a year after this term applied, the number of banks and offices were growing significantly. The high level of rapid competition in banking industry would lead the banks to take an excessive risk because of the difficulty to predict the phenomenon in a rapid competition [9]. Bank is a financial institution that manages money to be the main object of its operations. Because of that, bank has Abstract—Banks have important role on the economy of Indonesia. With a fully regulated principle, Banking Sectors in Indonesia concern to keep in a good performance according to Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 13 / 1 / PBI / 2011 which emphasize on risk-based approach. Therefore, this paper aims to examine the factors affecting commercial banks business risk listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange. Those factors consist of risk profile (credit risk, liquidity risk, and interest rate risk), good corporate governance, earnings, and capital. The samples used in this research are 26 commercial banks listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange during research period since 2011 to 2013. This research uses multiple linear regression analysis. The result of the findings shows that credit risk has effect against business risk, while liquidity risk does not have effect against it. The rate of interest risk has effect against business risk. Good corporate governance does not have effect against business risk. Earnings have significant effect against business risk. Capital does not have effect against business risk. Hence, the implication of the research is that commercial banks business risk is affected by three factors of risk-based bank rating (credit risk, interest rate risk, and earnings).
基于风险的银行业务风险决定因素分析
由于印尼正在使用银行系统,因此为外部流程提供融资[3]。公司债务可能会使他们面临财务困难。换句话说,与银行业的表现相比,真实因素是脆弱的。印度尼西亚公民对印度尼西亚银行服务的高度依赖达到77.9%。与其他金融机构相比,农村银行占1.3%,保险公司占10.8%,养老基金占2.8%,企业融资占6.8%,其他非银行机构占0.9%[4]。基于这一事实,印尼人仍然更喜欢银行业,而不是其他资本市场活动。因此,银行业需要有良好的公司治理,以保持支持经济稳定的信誉。为了响应印尼社会的信任度,银行所编制的80% - 90%的基金来自第三方基金。银行资金的来源是通过储蓄存款、活期存款、定期存款等银行产品获得的第三方资金。2013年第三方资金占比为89.62%,以活期存款和定期存款为主[6]。银行客户对第三方资金比例的依赖程度越高,银行管理层开展社会资金的风险越大。为了保持社会的可信度,银行业必须实施审慎原则,因为它关系到业务的可持续性。印度尼西亚的银行业增长显著,其特点是有许多银行和银行办事处。印度尼西亚银行业的发展受到1988年10月27日印尼银行放松管制一揽子计划的影响,该计划被称为Pakto 88[7]。改革的目的是为银行业注入更高水平的竞争,并增加全国各地的信贷供应[8]。Pakto 88引发了印尼银行业的自由化。银行自由化放宽了对银行设立的限制,因此在这一术语适用一年后,银行和办事处的数量显著增加。银行业高度的快速竞争会导致银行承担过高的风险,因为在快速竞争中这种现象很难预测[9]。银行是以管理资金为主要经营对象的金融机构。摘要:银行在印尼经济中扮演着重要的角色。在全面监管的原则下,印度尼西亚的银行业根据强调基于风险的方法的第13 / 1 / PBI / 2011号印度尼西亚银行条例,关注保持良好的业绩。因此,本文旨在研究影响印尼证券交易所上市商业银行业务风险的因素。这些因素包括风险概况(信用风险、流动性风险和利率风险)、良好的公司治理、收益和资本。本研究的样本为2011 - 2013年研究期间在印尼证券交易所上市的26家商业银行。本研究采用多元线性回归分析。研究结果表明,信用风险对商业风险有影响,而流动性风险对商业风险没有影响。利率风险对企业经营风险有一定的防范作用。良好的公司治理并不能有效抵御商业风险。收益对企业风险有显著的抵御作用。资本对商业风险不起作用。因此,本研究的含义是商业银行的经营风险受到基于风险的银行评级的三个因素(信用风险、利率风险和收益)的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信