THE NATION STRIKES BACK: RECENT INFLUENCES ON TEACHER EDUCATION IN EUROPE

G. Weiner
{"title":"THE NATION STRIKES BACK: RECENT INFLUENCES ON TEACHER EDUCATION IN EUROPE","authors":"G. Weiner","doi":"10.15057/8266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper revisits a previous paper, published in 2001, which focused on five European trends in teacher education: professionalism, research, feminisation, traditions and, and globalisation. The original paper proposed that ‘Anglophone’ (equated with neo-liberalism) and ‘European’ (equated with social democracy) teacher education policies contain di#erent emphases and priorities, even if they are shaped also by specific national cultures and histories. This paper rea$rms the influence of neo-liberalism and social democracy on teacher education and also draws attention to two further issues: the di$culties of traditional teacher education when faced with increased cultural diversity and the faltering impact of globalisation, as the nation state reasserts its goal of re-creating, consolidating and transmitting national culture and norms. It was argued in an earlier paper that few people appreciate the size of the task of educating Europe’s teaching force: and even fewer are interested in teacher education in countries other than their own (Weiner, 2002). Despite exhortations to the contrary from the European Union (EU) and other supra-national bodies, we remain parochial when it comes to the education of our teachers. This was not always so, as Nisbet shows in his review of the cross-fertilisation of educational ideas across European countries pre-World War II (Nisbet, 2002). Thus, when we consider how di#erent countries have responded to the various impacts of global, economic and cultural change on education in recent years, we see di#erence rather than harmonisation. For example, Britain responded in the 1990s by creating a crisis of confidence in teachers and teacher education, followed by draconian measures to limit the autonomy of teaching professionals, impose greater conformity and regulation, and introduce checks and economic penalties in the case of non- compliance (Mahony and Hextall, 2000;","PeriodicalId":335834,"journal":{"name":"Hitotsubashi journal of social studies","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hitotsubashi journal of social studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15057/8266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This paper revisits a previous paper, published in 2001, which focused on five European trends in teacher education: professionalism, research, feminisation, traditions and, and globalisation. The original paper proposed that ‘Anglophone’ (equated with neo-liberalism) and ‘European’ (equated with social democracy) teacher education policies contain di#erent emphases and priorities, even if they are shaped also by specific national cultures and histories. This paper rea$rms the influence of neo-liberalism and social democracy on teacher education and also draws attention to two further issues: the di$culties of traditional teacher education when faced with increased cultural diversity and the faltering impact of globalisation, as the nation state reasserts its goal of re-creating, consolidating and transmitting national culture and norms. It was argued in an earlier paper that few people appreciate the size of the task of educating Europe’s teaching force: and even fewer are interested in teacher education in countries other than their own (Weiner, 2002). Despite exhortations to the contrary from the European Union (EU) and other supra-national bodies, we remain parochial when it comes to the education of our teachers. This was not always so, as Nisbet shows in his review of the cross-fertilisation of educational ideas across European countries pre-World War II (Nisbet, 2002). Thus, when we consider how di#erent countries have responded to the various impacts of global, economic and cultural change on education in recent years, we see di#erence rather than harmonisation. For example, Britain responded in the 1990s by creating a crisis of confidence in teachers and teacher education, followed by draconian measures to limit the autonomy of teaching professionals, impose greater conformity and regulation, and introduce checks and economic penalties in the case of non- compliance (Mahony and Hextall, 2000;
国家反击:最近对欧洲教师教育的影响
本文回顾了2001年发表的一篇论文,该论文关注的是欧洲教师教育的五大趋势:专业化、研究型、女性化、传统和全球化。最初的论文提出,“英语国家”(等同于新自由主义)和“欧洲”(等同于社会民主主义)的教师教育政策包含不同的重点和优先事项,即使它们也受到特定国家文化和历史的影响。本文回顾了新自由主义和社会民主主义对教师教育的影响,并进一步关注两个问题:面对日益增长的文化多样性,传统教师教育的多元文化,以及随着民族国家重申其重新创造、巩固和传播民族文化和规范的目标,全球化的影响正在减弱。在早期的一篇论文中,有人认为很少有人意识到教育欧洲教师队伍的任务的规模:甚至更少的人对本国以外国家的教师教育感兴趣(Weiner, 2002)。尽管欧洲联盟(欧盟)和其他超国家机构提出了相反的劝告,但在教师的教育方面,我们仍然很狭隘。正如尼斯贝特在他对二战前欧洲各国教育理念相互融合的回顾中所显示的那样,情况并非总是如此(Nisbet, 2002)。因此,当我们考虑近年来不同国家如何应对全球、经济和文化变化对教育的各种影响时,我们看到的是差异而不是协调。例如,英国在20世纪90年代通过制造对教师和教师教育的信任危机做出了回应,随后采取严厉措施限制教学专业人员的自主权,施加更大的一致性和监管,并在不遵守的情况下引入检查和经济处罚(Mahony和Hextall, 2000;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信