Old believers in the territory of the Russian empire

G. Stricker
{"title":"Old believers in the territory of the Russian empire","authors":"G. Stricker","doi":"10.1080/09637499008431451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Old Believer schism was the most significant split in the history of the Russian Orthodox Church. We are aware of earlier, minor, breakaway movements such as the cloth shearers (strigolnikt) in 14th century Novgorod and Pskov or the ludaisers in Novgorod and Moscow a century later. Of course many important sects developed as protest movements from within Russian Orthodoxy, mainly from the 18th century onwards (e.g. the Khlysty who led to the Skoptsy; the Dukhobors who led to the Molokans through to the Tolstoyans in the 20th century, and many others besides).Seen in the long term however, none of these gained importance or· persisted to the same extent as the Old Believer movement, which in spite of countless schisms remains to this day a force to be reckoned with by the Moscow Patriarchate. The efforts of the patriarchate since 1971 to establish good relations with the Old Believers speak for themselves. Unlike other divisions within Orthodoxy, the roots of the Old Believer movement lay not in a protest against the doctrine or life of the Orthodox Church, but rather in a rejection of formal innovations in'> rites, church practice and written tradition, which seem unimportant today. In the 17th century the borders of the Russian Empire were extended to the south west (e.g. by the subjection of eastern Ukraine to Moscow in 1663). This development, which had in . fact begun decades earlier, strengthened church links with Constantinople and resulted in a reconsideration of the Greek roots of Russian Orthodoxy. It had already been noted in Russian church circles that the centuries of isolation following Tatar rule (1240 to approximately 1440) had led to a considerable alienation from the Greek mother","PeriodicalId":197393,"journal":{"name":"Religion in Communist Lands","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion in Communist Lands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09637499008431451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The Old Believer schism was the most significant split in the history of the Russian Orthodox Church. We are aware of earlier, minor, breakaway movements such as the cloth shearers (strigolnikt) in 14th century Novgorod and Pskov or the ludaisers in Novgorod and Moscow a century later. Of course many important sects developed as protest movements from within Russian Orthodoxy, mainly from the 18th century onwards (e.g. the Khlysty who led to the Skoptsy; the Dukhobors who led to the Molokans through to the Tolstoyans in the 20th century, and many others besides).Seen in the long term however, none of these gained importance or· persisted to the same extent as the Old Believer movement, which in spite of countless schisms remains to this day a force to be reckoned with by the Moscow Patriarchate. The efforts of the patriarchate since 1971 to establish good relations with the Old Believers speak for themselves. Unlike other divisions within Orthodoxy, the roots of the Old Believer movement lay not in a protest against the doctrine or life of the Orthodox Church, but rather in a rejection of formal innovations in'> rites, church practice and written tradition, which seem unimportant today. In the 17th century the borders of the Russian Empire were extended to the south west (e.g. by the subjection of eastern Ukraine to Moscow in 1663). This development, which had in . fact begun decades earlier, strengthened church links with Constantinople and resulted in a reconsideration of the Greek roots of Russian Orthodoxy. It had already been noted in Russian church circles that the centuries of isolation following Tatar rule (1240 to approximately 1440) had led to a considerable alienation from the Greek mother
俄罗斯帝国领土上的老信徒
老信徒分裂是俄罗斯东正教历史上最重大的分裂。我们知道更早的小规模分离运动,比如14世纪诺夫哥罗德和普斯科夫的剪布工人(strigolnikt),以及一个世纪后诺夫哥罗德和莫斯科的卢达瑟工人(ludaisers)。当然,许多重要的教派从俄罗斯东正教内部发展成为抗议运动,主要是从18世纪开始的(例如,导致了Skoptsy的Khlysty;20世纪从莫洛坎人到托尔斯泰派的杜霍波尔,以及其他许多人)。然而,从长远来看,这些运动都没有像老信徒运动那样重要或持续下去,尽管有无数的分裂,但它至今仍是莫斯科宗主教区不可忽视的力量。自1971年以来,宗主教区与旧信徒建立良好关系的努力不言自明。与东正教内部的其他分支不同,老信徒运动的根源不在于对东正教教义或生活的抗议,而在于对仪式、教会实践和书面传统的正式创新的拒绝,这些在今天看来并不重要。在17世纪,俄罗斯帝国的边界向西南延伸(例如,1663年乌克兰东部被莫斯科占领)。这一发展,在。这一事件早在几十年前就开始了,加强了教会与君士坦丁堡的联系,并导致了对俄罗斯东正教希腊根源的重新思考。俄罗斯教会界已经注意到,在鞑靼统治(1240年至大约1440年)之后的几个世纪的孤立导致了与希腊母亲的相当疏远
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书