Redundancy and information leakage in fine-grained access control

G. Kabra, Ravishankar Ramamurthy, S. Sudarshan
{"title":"Redundancy and information leakage in fine-grained access control","authors":"G. Kabra, Ravishankar Ramamurthy, S. Sudarshan","doi":"10.1145/1142473.1142489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current SQL standard for access control is coarse grained, in that it grants access to all rows of a table or none. Fine-grained access control, which allows control of access at the granularity of individual rows, and to specific columns within those rows, is required in practically all database applications. There are several models for fine grained access control, but the majority of them follow a view replacement strategy. There are two significant problems with most implementations of the view replacement model, namely (a) the unnecessary overhead of the access control predicates when they are redundant and (b) the potential of information leakage through channels such as user-defined functions, and operations that cause exceptions and error messages. We first propose techniques for redundancy removal. We then define when a query plan is safe with respect to UDFs and other unsafe functions, and propose techniques to generate safe query plans. We have prototyped redundancy removal and safe UDF pushdown on the Microsoft SQL Server query optimizer, and present a preliminary performance study.","PeriodicalId":416090,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1142473.1142489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

The current SQL standard for access control is coarse grained, in that it grants access to all rows of a table or none. Fine-grained access control, which allows control of access at the granularity of individual rows, and to specific columns within those rows, is required in practically all database applications. There are several models for fine grained access control, but the majority of them follow a view replacement strategy. There are two significant problems with most implementations of the view replacement model, namely (a) the unnecessary overhead of the access control predicates when they are redundant and (b) the potential of information leakage through channels such as user-defined functions, and operations that cause exceptions and error messages. We first propose techniques for redundancy removal. We then define when a query plan is safe with respect to UDFs and other unsafe functions, and propose techniques to generate safe query plans. We have prototyped redundancy removal and safe UDF pushdown on the Microsoft SQL Server query optimizer, and present a preliminary performance study.
细粒度访问控制中的冗余和信息泄漏
当前用于访问控制的SQL标准是粗粒度的,因为它授予对表的所有行或没有行的访问权限。细粒度访问控制实际上是所有数据库应用程序都需要的,它允许以单个行的粒度控制访问,以及对这些行中特定列的访问。细粒度访问控制有几种模型,但它们中的大多数都遵循视图替换策略。视图替换模型的大多数实现存在两个重要问题,即(a)访问控制谓词冗余时不必要的开销和(b)通过用户定义函数等通道泄露信息的可能性,以及导致异常和错误消息的操作。我们首先提出冗余去除技术。然后,我们定义查询计划相对于udf和其他不安全函数在什么情况下是安全的,并提出生成安全查询计划的技术。我们在Microsoft SQL Server查询优化器上创建了冗余删除和安全UDF下推的原型,并进行了初步的性能研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信