Transnational relations and world politics: New approach

Ruzbeh Bejker
{"title":"Transnational relations and world politics: New approach","authors":"Ruzbeh Bejker","doi":"10.2298/medjp2302263b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The past forty years has seen a marked increase in the proliferation of\n transnational actors in the international system. The rise of these actors\n has sparked a continuing debate within the field of international relations\n on how they influence state action. This emergent literature on\n ?transnational studies? within international relations has mainly pitted\n advocates of an approach that views states as the dominant force in world\n politics versus those who see the rise of transnational actors as empirical\n proof that the primacy of states as actors in the international system is\n being replaced. New literature in the mid-1990s tried to move transnational\n studies beyond these debates of the past. What both sides failed to grasp\n was that, because both looked to how transnational actors could affect\n domestic state behavior, they really in the end shared the same research\n question (it was only their approach to the question that differed). The\n result is a thin account of how transnational actors matter and a series of\n measurement problems due to the underlying concepts being much too general.\n This article introduces a new theoretical framework for testing the ability\n of transnational actors to influence domestic state behavior.","PeriodicalId":316095,"journal":{"name":"Medjunarodni problemi","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medjunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp2302263b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The past forty years has seen a marked increase in the proliferation of transnational actors in the international system. The rise of these actors has sparked a continuing debate within the field of international relations on how they influence state action. This emergent literature on ?transnational studies? within international relations has mainly pitted advocates of an approach that views states as the dominant force in world politics versus those who see the rise of transnational actors as empirical proof that the primacy of states as actors in the international system is being replaced. New literature in the mid-1990s tried to move transnational studies beyond these debates of the past. What both sides failed to grasp was that, because both looked to how transnational actors could affect domestic state behavior, they really in the end shared the same research question (it was only their approach to the question that differed). The result is a thin account of how transnational actors matter and a series of measurement problems due to the underlying concepts being much too general. This article introduces a new theoretical framework for testing the ability of transnational actors to influence domestic state behavior.
跨国关系与世界政治:新途径
在过去四十年中,国际体系中跨国行为体的扩散有了显著的增加。这些行为体的崛起引发了国际关系领域内关于它们如何影响国家行动的持续辩论。这种关于跨国研究的新兴文献?在国际关系中,主要存在两种观点,一种观点认为国家是世界政治中的主导力量,另一种观点认为跨国行为体的崛起是国家在国际体系中作为行为体的首要地位正在被取代的经验证据。20世纪90年代中期的新文学试图使跨国研究超越过去的这些争论。双方都没有理解的是,因为他们都关注跨国行为者如何影响国内国家行为,他们最终都有相同的研究问题(只是他们对问题的方法不同)。其结果是对跨国行为者如何重要以及由于潜在概念过于笼统而导致的一系列测量问题的单薄描述。本文介绍了一个新的理论框架,用于测试跨国行为者影响国内国家行为的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信