An Evaluation on New Governmental System Discussions and System Proposals in Turkey

Yakup Bulut, Soner Akin
{"title":"An Evaluation on New Governmental System Discussions and System Proposals in Turkey","authors":"Yakup Bulut, Soner Akin","doi":"10.25069/spmj.404803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Historically, many countries have sought to establish a more stable governmental system. At world scale; it is seen that the most common systems of government in practice today are \"presidential\", \"semi-presidential\" and \"parliamentary system\". The obstacles in the governmental systems are instability in the administration which starts the search for new system. Along with the new governmental system proposals in Turkey, it was begun to be argued that the \"Turkish Type\", \"Presidential Parliamentary System\", \"Half Presidency\", \"Presidency\" and \"Party Presidency\" models in Turkey wanted a stable government. In Turkey, the influence of pressure groups such as the categorized business world and media have been included in the system discussions, though those discussions were not carried out in a comprehensive manner. Deficiencies in Turkey, especially in the culture of political reconciliation, political instability, ineffectiveness of members of the legislative body, can be seen as the factors that trigger the search for new systems. This study will focus on the new positional arguments in the context of the system discussions in Turkey on behalf of stable and long-term management, discussing the proposals of constitutional amendments in terms of probable deficiencies, political instability, and ineffectiveness of legislative members.","PeriodicalId":395315,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Public Management Journal","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Public Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25069/spmj.404803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Historically, many countries have sought to establish a more stable governmental system. At world scale; it is seen that the most common systems of government in practice today are "presidential", "semi-presidential" and "parliamentary system". The obstacles in the governmental systems are instability in the administration which starts the search for new system. Along with the new governmental system proposals in Turkey, it was begun to be argued that the "Turkish Type", "Presidential Parliamentary System", "Half Presidency", "Presidency" and "Party Presidency" models in Turkey wanted a stable government. In Turkey, the influence of pressure groups such as the categorized business world and media have been included in the system discussions, though those discussions were not carried out in a comprehensive manner. Deficiencies in Turkey, especially in the culture of political reconciliation, political instability, ineffectiveness of members of the legislative body, can be seen as the factors that trigger the search for new systems. This study will focus on the new positional arguments in the context of the system discussions in Turkey on behalf of stable and long-term management, discussing the proposals of constitutional amendments in terms of probable deficiencies, political instability, and ineffectiveness of legislative members.
土耳其新政府制度讨论与制度建议评析
历史上,许多国家都试图建立一个更稳定的政府体系。在世界范围内;可见,当今实践中最常见的政府制度是“总统制”、“半总统制”和“议会制”。政府体制的障碍是政府的不稳定,政府开始寻求新的体制。随着土耳其新政府体制的提出,土耳其的“土耳其式”、“总统制议会制”、“半总统制”、“总统制”、“党总统制”等模式都被认为是为了建立一个稳定的政府。在土耳其,诸如工商界和媒体等压力集团的影响已被列入制度讨论,尽管这些讨论没有全面进行。土耳其的缺陷,特别是政治和解文化方面的缺陷、政治不稳定、立法机构成员的无能,可以看作是促使寻求新制度的因素。本研究将集中在土耳其代表稳定和长期管理的制度讨论背景下的新立场论点,从可能的缺陷、政治不稳定和立法成员的无效等方面讨论宪法修正案的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信