OPTIMIZING CAMERA PLACEMENT FOR A LUMINANCE-BASED SHADING CONTROL SYSTEM

A. Mentens, G. Scheir, Y. Ghysel, F. Descamps, J. Lataire, V. Jacobs
{"title":"OPTIMIZING CAMERA PLACEMENT FOR A LUMINANCE-BASED SHADING CONTROL SYSTEM","authors":"A. Mentens, G. Scheir, Y. Ghysel, F. Descamps, J. Lataire, V. Jacobs","doi":"10.25039/x48.2021.po39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shading control strategies are nowadays employed in office environments to improve the visual comfort of the user. These strategies are often solely illuminance-based whereas comfort metrics as the Daylight Glare Probability (DGP) also need luminance values. In previous studies, daylight glare has been assessed by calculating the DGP from luminance maps obtained via a luminance camera or from a High Dynamic Range (HDR) image obtained with a commercially available camera. These detectors are traditionally mounted close to the user and aligned with the viewing direction. In real office environments, this camera position is impractical, and simulations based on machine learning techniques have shown a relation between the DGP from an observer's viewpoint and the DGP calculated from a ceiling camera. This paper experimentally validates this method in a real office environment by using two different cameras and two different illuminance sensors, i.e., a low-cost illuminance sensor and a calibrated sensor. Both cameras render similar results, although one camera overestimates the DGP. Moreover, the shortcomings of the simulation results are pinpointed and the obstacles for a realistic application are addressed. Furthermore, it was found that when moving the cameras to different positions, the sun position was shown to be an informative additional input for correlating the two DGP values. In future work, additional data will be analysed to determine the performance in other weather conditions and window orientations.","PeriodicalId":363368,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Conference CIE 2021","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Conference CIE 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25039/x48.2021.po39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Shading control strategies are nowadays employed in office environments to improve the visual comfort of the user. These strategies are often solely illuminance-based whereas comfort metrics as the Daylight Glare Probability (DGP) also need luminance values. In previous studies, daylight glare has been assessed by calculating the DGP from luminance maps obtained via a luminance camera or from a High Dynamic Range (HDR) image obtained with a commercially available camera. These detectors are traditionally mounted close to the user and aligned with the viewing direction. In real office environments, this camera position is impractical, and simulations based on machine learning techniques have shown a relation between the DGP from an observer's viewpoint and the DGP calculated from a ceiling camera. This paper experimentally validates this method in a real office environment by using two different cameras and two different illuminance sensors, i.e., a low-cost illuminance sensor and a calibrated sensor. Both cameras render similar results, although one camera overestimates the DGP. Moreover, the shortcomings of the simulation results are pinpointed and the obstacles for a realistic application are addressed. Furthermore, it was found that when moving the cameras to different positions, the sun position was shown to be an informative additional input for correlating the two DGP values. In future work, additional data will be analysed to determine the performance in other weather conditions and window orientations.
为基于亮度的阴影控制系统优化摄像机位置
遮阳控制策略目前被用于办公环境,以提高用户的视觉舒适度。这些策略通常仅基于照度,而舒适指标如日光眩光概率(DGP)也需要照度值。在以前的研究中,通过计算DGP来评估日光眩光,DGP来自通过亮度相机获得的亮度图或通过市售相机获得的高动态范围(HDR)图像。这些探测器通常安装在用户附近,并与观察方向对齐。在真实的办公环境中,这种摄像机位置是不切实际的,基于机器学习技术的模拟显示了观察者视角下的DGP与天花板摄像机计算的DGP之间的关系。本文在一个真实的办公环境中,通过使用两个不同的摄像头和两个不同的照度传感器,即一个低成本的照度传感器和一个校准过的传感器,对该方法进行了实验验证。两款相机的结果相似,尽管其中一款相机高估了DGP。此外,指出了仿真结果的不足之处,并指出了实际应用中存在的障碍。此外,研究发现,当将相机移动到不同位置时,太阳位置被证明是关联两个DGP值的信息附加输入。在未来的工作中,将分析更多的数据,以确定在其他天气条件和窗户方向下的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信