Lessons learned on applying design science for bridging the collaboration gap between industry and academia in empirical software engineering

Pilar Rodríguez, P. Kuvaja, M. Oivo
{"title":"Lessons learned on applying design science for bridging the collaboration gap between industry and academia in empirical software engineering","authors":"Pilar Rodríguez, P. Kuvaja, M. Oivo","doi":"10.1145/2593690.2593694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collaboration between industry practitioners and researchers has been reported as a challenge to conduct empirical studies in software engineering. Gaining practitioners interest in research activities is challenging in the software development industry characterized by tough competition and short time-to-market. Often, practitioners do not see the direct value in collaborating with researchers. Meanwhile, researchers are frequently frustrated because they have no access to the real-world data that would enable them to develop scientific knowledge. Design science has become a popular research framework in Information Systems. This paper describes our lessons learned on how design science can help to attract and motivate industry practitioners to take part in empirical research. We present our practical experiences with using design science in the context of empirical software engineering, and how the design science framework helped us to bridge the collaborative gap with our industry partners. In illustrating our experiences, we present two case studies conducted in collaboration with Ericsson and Elektrobit in which the design science framework was followed. Based on our experience, design science is a suitable research framework for empirical software engineering since much of the research in the field is constructive. The similarities between the design science practices and the day-to-day work of practitioners in industry make it easy for them to understand the research approach. Thus, it supports their willingness to participate in research activities.","PeriodicalId":200036,"journal":{"name":"Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry","volume":"22 14_suppl 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2593690.2593694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Collaboration between industry practitioners and researchers has been reported as a challenge to conduct empirical studies in software engineering. Gaining practitioners interest in research activities is challenging in the software development industry characterized by tough competition and short time-to-market. Often, practitioners do not see the direct value in collaborating with researchers. Meanwhile, researchers are frequently frustrated because they have no access to the real-world data that would enable them to develop scientific knowledge. Design science has become a popular research framework in Information Systems. This paper describes our lessons learned on how design science can help to attract and motivate industry practitioners to take part in empirical research. We present our practical experiences with using design science in the context of empirical software engineering, and how the design science framework helped us to bridge the collaborative gap with our industry partners. In illustrating our experiences, we present two case studies conducted in collaboration with Ericsson and Elektrobit in which the design science framework was followed. Based on our experience, design science is a suitable research framework for empirical software engineering since much of the research in the field is constructive. The similarities between the design science practices and the day-to-day work of practitioners in industry make it easy for them to understand the research approach. Thus, it supports their willingness to participate in research activities.
在应用设计科学以弥合经验软件工程中工业界和学术界之间的协作差距方面获得的经验教训
据报道,行业从业者和研究人员之间的协作是在软件工程中进行实证研究的挑战。在竞争激烈和上市时间短的软件开发行业中,获得实践者对研究活动的兴趣是具有挑战性的。通常,从业者看不到与研究人员合作的直接价值。与此同时,研究人员经常感到沮丧,因为他们无法获得使他们能够发展科学知识的真实世界数据。设计科学已经成为信息系统中一个流行的研究框架。本文描述了我们在设计科学如何帮助吸引和激励行业从业者参与实证研究方面的经验教训。我们展示了在经验软件工程的背景下使用设计科学的实践经验,以及设计科学框架如何帮助我们弥合与行业伙伴的协作差距。为了说明我们的经验,我们提出了与爱立信和Elektrobit合作进行的两个案例研究,其中遵循了设计科学框架。根据我们的经验,设计科学是实证软件工程的合适研究框架,因为该领域的许多研究都是建设性的。设计科学实践与工业实践者日常工作之间的相似性使他们很容易理解研究方法。因此,它支持他们参与研究活动的意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信