Das BVerfG zwischen Verfassungsinterpretation, europäischer Integration und politischer Positionierung – Eine Zwischenbilanz zum NPD-Verbotsurteil vom 17.1.2017

Lise Känner
{"title":"Das BVerfG zwischen Verfassungsinterpretation, europäischer Integration und politischer Positionierung – Eine Zwischenbilanz zum NPD-Verbotsurteil vom 17.1.2017","authors":"Lise Känner","doi":"10.5771/2193-7869-2019-1-57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the author examines the effects that the judgment of the German Constitutional Court concerning the party ban in Art. 21 I GG (17 January 2017) had on government, legislator and society since it was rendered roughly two years ago. For this purpose, she illustrates the relevant changes of the procedural and substantive law of Art. 21 GG and analyses the historical and political background of those changes. She puts special emphasis on the influence that the case law of the ECHR had on the new interpretation of Art. 21 GG. In the end, she questions whether the judgment, which on the surface emphasises the importance of strengthening the freedom of political parties, is able to live up to it’s own standards in reality. For this, she studies to what extent state repression (also, and in particular illegal one) of political parties has increased during the time since the judgment.","PeriodicalId":275616,"journal":{"name":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2019-1-57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, the author examines the effects that the judgment of the German Constitutional Court concerning the party ban in Art. 21 I GG (17 January 2017) had on government, legislator and society since it was rendered roughly two years ago. For this purpose, she illustrates the relevant changes of the procedural and substantive law of Art. 21 GG and analyses the historical and political background of those changes. She puts special emphasis on the influence that the case law of the ECHR had on the new interpretation of Art. 21 GG. In the end, she questions whether the judgment, which on the surface emphasises the importance of strengthening the freedom of political parties, is able to live up to it’s own standards in reality. For this, she studies to what extent state repression (also, and in particular illegal one) of political parties has increased during the time since the judgment.
宪政阐释、欧洲一体化和政策定位的工作——是2017年17月17日核不扩散禁令的中期规定
在本文中,作者考察了大约两年前德国宪法法院就《德国宪法》第21条(2017年1月17日)中的政党禁令作出的判决对政府、立法者和社会的影响。为此,她阐述了《合同法》第21条程序法和实体法的相关变化,并分析了这些变化的历史和政治背景。她特别强调了欧洲人权法院判例法对《欧洲人权公约》第21条新解释的影响,最后质疑表面上强调加强政党自由的判决在现实中是否能够达到自己的标准。为此,她研究了自判决以来,国家对政党的镇压(尤其是非法镇压)在多大程度上有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信