CHARACTERIZING THE STIFFNESS OF A SHALLOW BEDROCK SITE USING THE MULTICHANNEL ANALYSIS OF SURFACE WAVES (MASW) METHOD WITH RAYLEIGH AND LOVE WAVES

Siavash Mahvelati, J. Coe
{"title":"CHARACTERIZING THE STIFFNESS OF A SHALLOW BEDROCK SITE USING THE MULTICHANNEL ANALYSIS OF SURFACE WAVES (MASW) METHOD WITH RAYLEIGH AND LOVE WAVES","authors":"Siavash Mahvelati, J. Coe","doi":"10.4133/SAGEEP.31-018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) method continues to increase in popularity as a tool to characterize subsurface stiffness for geotechnical engineering purposes, particularly in cases where seismic site characterization is important. MASW is commonly performed using vertical impacts on the ground surface to generate Rayleigh waves (i.e., MASRW). The dispersive behavior of the Rayleigh wave is then imaged by transforming the raw waveforms from the time-space domain into the frequency-phase velocity domain. A characteristic dispersion curve for the site is selected based on examining the pattern of energy accumulation in the dispersion image. An inversion algorithm is then implemented to locate the most probable subsurface stiffness profile that caused the measured dispersion curve. While much research has been devoted to MASRW, horizontally-polarized Love waves have seen limited use in MASW investigations (MASLW), despite evidence to support some advantages in their implementation. In this study, MASW was performed using both Rayleigh and Love waves to characterize conditions at the same shallow bedrock site. To allow for a direct comparison between the results of Rayleigh waves and Love waves, the survey lines for both MASW tests were located in exactly the same position. Generally, the subsurface stiffness profiles resulting from inversion of the MASRW and MASLW dispersion curves agreed reasonably well. However, there were some subtle differences in interpretation of the dispersion images. This paper summarizes field conditions and testing configuration, followed by a discussion of data analysis and interpretation.","PeriodicalId":156801,"journal":{"name":"Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2018","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4133/SAGEEP.31-018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) method continues to increase in popularity as a tool to characterize subsurface stiffness for geotechnical engineering purposes, particularly in cases where seismic site characterization is important. MASW is commonly performed using vertical impacts on the ground surface to generate Rayleigh waves (i.e., MASRW). The dispersive behavior of the Rayleigh wave is then imaged by transforming the raw waveforms from the time-space domain into the frequency-phase velocity domain. A characteristic dispersion curve for the site is selected based on examining the pattern of energy accumulation in the dispersion image. An inversion algorithm is then implemented to locate the most probable subsurface stiffness profile that caused the measured dispersion curve. While much research has been devoted to MASRW, horizontally-polarized Love waves have seen limited use in MASW investigations (MASLW), despite evidence to support some advantages in their implementation. In this study, MASW was performed using both Rayleigh and Love waves to characterize conditions at the same shallow bedrock site. To allow for a direct comparison between the results of Rayleigh waves and Love waves, the survey lines for both MASW tests were located in exactly the same position. Generally, the subsurface stiffness profiles resulting from inversion of the MASRW and MASLW dispersion curves agreed reasonably well. However, there were some subtle differences in interpretation of the dispersion images. This paper summarizes field conditions and testing configuration, followed by a discussion of data analysis and interpretation.
用瑞利波和洛夫波的多通道表面波分析方法表征浅层基岩场地的刚度
多通道表面波分析(MASW)方法作为岩土工程中表征地下刚度的工具越来越受欢迎,特别是在地震场地表征很重要的情况下。MASRW通常是利用对地面的垂直撞击产生瑞利波(即MASRW)来实现的。然后通过将原始波形从时空域转换为频相速度域,对瑞利波的色散行为进行成像。通过对色散图像中能量积累模式的检测,选择了该部位的特征色散曲线。然后实现了一种反演算法,以定位最可能引起测量色散曲线的次表面刚度剖面。虽然有很多研究致力于MASRW,但水平极化Love波在MASLW调查中的应用有限,尽管有证据支持其实施中的一些优势。在本研究中,使用Rayleigh波和Love波进行MASW,以表征同一浅层基岩位置的条件。为了直接比较瑞利波和洛夫波的结果,两种MASW测试的测量线都位于完全相同的位置。总体而言,反演得到的MASRW和MASLW色散曲线的次地表刚度曲线吻合较好。然而,在色散图像的解释上存在一些微妙的差异。本文概述了现场条件和测试配置,然后讨论了数据分析和解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信