Design-based research as a research methodology in teacher and social education – a scoping review

Astrid Lasthein Lehrmann, H. Skovbjerg, Simone Jessen Arnfred
{"title":"Design-based research as a research methodology in teacher and social education – a scoping review","authors":"Astrid Lasthein Lehrmann, H. Skovbjerg, Simone Jessen Arnfred","doi":"10.15460/eder.6.3.1850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nAs a methodological approach, design-based research (DBR) has been widely applied within research on educational systems. Nevertheless, the question of how DBR is used as a research method in specific educational environments remains. This scoping review focuses on DBR as a research methodology in teacher education and social education. Such a review can productively map a research area and can guide further research within a field. For this scoping review, 27 articles were selected, and the results showed that DBR is used as a research method in teacher education and social education; however, there are differences in how strictly the articles apply the approaches that are found and are well-known as important features within the DBR methodology. The main finding is that although the selected articles outline their research according to DBR, they do not strictly use the methodology in practice. In most studies, participants are considered co-designers, and the research is conducted in iterative cycles. Because these are the fundamental core features of DBR, it would be relevant to suggest a stronger emphasis on the guidelines within the methodology and insist that future research follows these guidelines to remain within the design-based methodology and thereby strengthen the epistemology of the methodology.\n","PeriodicalId":145708,"journal":{"name":"EDeR. Educational Design Research","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDeR. Educational Design Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15460/eder.6.3.1850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As a methodological approach, design-based research (DBR) has been widely applied within research on educational systems. Nevertheless, the question of how DBR is used as a research method in specific educational environments remains. This scoping review focuses on DBR as a research methodology in teacher education and social education. Such a review can productively map a research area and can guide further research within a field. For this scoping review, 27 articles were selected, and the results showed that DBR is used as a research method in teacher education and social education; however, there are differences in how strictly the articles apply the approaches that are found and are well-known as important features within the DBR methodology. The main finding is that although the selected articles outline their research according to DBR, they do not strictly use the methodology in practice. In most studies, participants are considered co-designers, and the research is conducted in iterative cycles. Because these are the fundamental core features of DBR, it would be relevant to suggest a stronger emphasis on the guidelines within the methodology and insist that future research follows these guidelines to remain within the design-based methodology and thereby strengthen the epistemology of the methodology.
基于设计的研究方法在教师教育和社会教育中的应用——一个范围回顾
基于设计的研究(DBR)作为一种方法论,在教育系统研究中得到了广泛的应用。然而,如何在特定的教育环境中使用DBR作为一种研究方法的问题仍然存在。本文的研究范围主要集中在DBR作为教师教育和社会教育的研究方法。这样的评论可以有效地绘制一个研究领域的地图,并可以指导一个领域内的进一步研究。本次研究选取了27篇文献,结果表明:DBR在教师教育和社会教育中被用作研究方法;然而,在如何严格地应用已发现的方法和众所周知的DBR方法中的重要特性方面存在差异。主要发现是,尽管所选文章根据DBR概述了他们的研究,但他们在实践中并没有严格使用该方法。在大多数研究中,参与者被认为是共同设计者,并且研究是在迭代循环中进行的。因为这些都是DBR的基本核心特征,建议更加强调方法论中的指导方针,并坚持未来的研究遵循这些指导方针,以保持在基于设计的方法论中,从而加强方法论的认识论,这是相关的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信