PENGARUH PELATIHAN TERHADAP PRODUKTIVITAS KERJA PEGAWAI DENGAN MOTIVASI SEBAGAI VARIABEL MEDIASI (Pada PT. NISAN ABADI JAYA)

Rina Loliyana, Misran Hadi, Evi Meidasari
{"title":"PENGARUH PELATIHAN TERHADAP PRODUKTIVITAS KERJA PEGAWAI DENGAN MOTIVASI SEBAGAI VARIABEL MEDIASI (Pada PT. NISAN ABADI JAYA)","authors":"Rina Loliyana, Misran Hadi, Evi Meidasari","doi":"10.57084/jmb.v4i1.1052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study aims to determine the effect of training on employee work productivity with motivation as a mediating  variable. This study took a sample of 54 with a population of 115. The data collection technique was to  distribute questionnaires to respondents. The analysis method itself uses Validity Test, Reliability Test, Normality Test, Heteroscedasticity Test, Linearity Test, Simple Regression Test, t Statistics Test, f Statistical Test, R2 Determinant Coefficient Test, and Path Analysis. The results of this study indicate that the training variable has a significant effect on the motivation variable because it has a t value of 5.177 t table 1.675, the training variable has a significant influence on the work productivity variable because it has a t value of 4.249 t table 1.675, the motivation variable has a significant influence. significant to the work productivity variable because it has a t value of 5.920 t table  1.675,  and  the  training  variable  does  not  have  a  significant  indirect  effect  on  the  work productivity variable through motivation as an intervening variable, which is  0.299. Based on the decision making, the result of the indirect effect is 0.583 x 0.513 = 0.299. Based on decision making, the result of the indirect effect is 0.299 from the direct effect of 0.583. So, Ha is rejected and Ho is accepted. Keywords: Training, Work Productivity, Motivation","PeriodicalId":222244,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis (JMB)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis (JMB)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57084/jmb.v4i1.1052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aims to determine the effect of training on employee work productivity with motivation as a mediating  variable. This study took a sample of 54 with a population of 115. The data collection technique was to  distribute questionnaires to respondents. The analysis method itself uses Validity Test, Reliability Test, Normality Test, Heteroscedasticity Test, Linearity Test, Simple Regression Test, t Statistics Test, f Statistical Test, R2 Determinant Coefficient Test, and Path Analysis. The results of this study indicate that the training variable has a significant effect on the motivation variable because it has a t value of 5.177 t table 1.675, the training variable has a significant influence on the work productivity variable because it has a t value of 4.249 t table 1.675, the motivation variable has a significant influence. significant to the work productivity variable because it has a t value of 5.920 t table  1.675,  and  the  training  variable  does  not  have  a  significant  indirect  effect  on  the  work productivity variable through motivation as an intervening variable, which is  0.299. Based on the decision making, the result of the indirect effect is 0.583 x 0.513 = 0.299. Based on decision making, the result of the indirect effect is 0.299 from the direct effect of 0.583. So, Ha is rejected and Ho is accepted. Keywords: Training, Work Productivity, Motivation
培训对中介变量员工激励生产力的影响(在PT. NISAN JAYA)
摘要本研究以动机为中介变量,探讨培训对员工工作效率的影响。这项研究从115人中抽取了54人的样本。数据收集方法是向受访者分发问卷。分析方法本身采用了效度检验、信度检验、正态性检验、异方差检验、线性检验、简单回归检验、t统计检验、f统计检验、R2决定系数检验和通径分析。本研究结果表明,培训变量对动机变量有显著影响,因为它的t值为5.177(表1.675);培训变量对工作效率变量有显著影响,因为它的t值为4.249(表1.675),动机变量有显著影响。对工作生产率变量显著是因为其t值为5.920(表1.675),而培训变量通过动机作为中介变量对工作生产率变量没有显著的间接影响,其t值为0.299。基于决策,间接效应的结果为0.583 × 0.513 = 0.299。基于决策,直接效应为0.583,间接效应的结果为0.299。因此,哈被拒绝,何被接受。关键词:培训,工作效率,激励
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信