New Perspectives

B. O’Halloran
{"title":"New Perspectives","authors":"B. O’Halloran","doi":"10.1163/9789004386150_004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Through the case of EU foreign and security policy we reconsider the concept of great power . According to common wisdom, the EU cannot be a great power, whatever the pro-nouncements of its top officials may be. We argue that ‘great power’ has been miscast in IR theory as a status rather than as a social role , and, consequently, that the EU can indeed be viewed as playing the great power role. Such a conceptual shift moves analytical attention away from questions of what the EU is – ‘big’, ‘small’, ‘great’, and so on – to what it is expected to do in international politics. We focus on the expectation that great powers engage in the management of the international system, assessing the EU as a great power manager in two senses: first, in the classical sense of ‘great power management’ of Hedley Bull – which centers on great powers’ creation of regional spheres of influence and the maintenance of the general balance of power – and second, in light of recent corrections to Bull’s approach by Alexander Astrov and others, who suggest great power management has changed toward a logic of governmentality, i.e. ‘conducting the conduct’ of lesser states.","PeriodicalId":321357,"journal":{"name":"The Political Economy of Classical Athens","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Political Economy of Classical Athens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004386150_004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Through the case of EU foreign and security policy we reconsider the concept of great power . According to common wisdom, the EU cannot be a great power, whatever the pro-nouncements of its top officials may be. We argue that ‘great power’ has been miscast in IR theory as a status rather than as a social role , and, consequently, that the EU can indeed be viewed as playing the great power role. Such a conceptual shift moves analytical attention away from questions of what the EU is – ‘big’, ‘small’, ‘great’, and so on – to what it is expected to do in international politics. We focus on the expectation that great powers engage in the management of the international system, assessing the EU as a great power manager in two senses: first, in the classical sense of ‘great power management’ of Hedley Bull – which centers on great powers’ creation of regional spheres of influence and the maintenance of the general balance of power – and second, in light of recent corrections to Bull’s approach by Alexander Astrov and others, who suggest great power management has changed toward a logic of governmentality, i.e. ‘conducting the conduct’ of lesser states.
新的视角
通过欧盟外交与安全政策的案例,我们重新思考了大国的概念。根据常识,欧盟不可能成为一个大国,无论其高级官员如何表态。我们认为,在国际关系理论中,“大国”被错误地定位为一种地位,而不是一种社会角色,因此,欧盟确实可以被视为扮演大国角色。这种观念上的转变将分析的注意力从欧盟是什么——“大”、“小”、“大”等等——转移到了人们对欧盟在国际政治中的作用的期望上。我们关注大国参与管理国际体系的期望,从两个方面评估欧盟作为大国管理者的地位:首先,这是海德利·布尔的经典意义上的“大国管理”——其核心是大国建立地区势力范围和维持总体权力平衡——其次,根据亚历山大·阿斯特洛夫等人最近对布尔方法的修正,他们认为大国管理已经转向了一种治理逻辑,即“指导”较小国家的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信