In-Line VIV Based on Forced-Vibration Tests

Decao Yin, Jie Wu, E. Passano, H. Lie, R. Peek, Octavio E. Sequeiros, S. Ang, Chiara A. Bernardo, Meliza Atienza
{"title":"In-Line VIV Based on Forced-Vibration Tests","authors":"Decao Yin, Jie Wu, E. Passano, H. Lie, R. Peek, Octavio E. Sequeiros, S. Ang, Chiara A. Bernardo, Meliza Atienza","doi":"10.1115/omae2019-95972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Excitation and added mass functions determined from forced vibration tests of a rigid cylinder undergoing harmonic motion in the flow are used in the semi-empirical software VIVANA to predict the VIV response of pipelines.\n An advantage of this approach, as opposed to the more-commonly-used response function approach, is that it can account for changing conditions along the length of the pipe, like changing current velocity, seabed proximity, and/or pipe diameter. This makes it useful for pipelines as well as for risers when such changes occur. Further, for pipelines, travelling wave effects play less of a role than for risers, so the VIVANA approach can be simplified by assuming the phase angle of the harmonic response is constant along the span.\n The interactions between cross-flow and in-line response that complicate the prediction of cross-flow VIV by the excitation function approach, do not arise for pure inline VIV. For the latter case, using the pure in-line forced vibration test data of Aronsen (2007), it is found that both VIVANA approach and simplified ‘SIVANA’ approach thereof predict VIV amplitudes consistent with experiments on flexible pipe (Ormen Lange umbilical VIV tests), and the DNVGL-RP-F105 response function for a range of structural and soil damping values.\n In a companion paper, this approach is applied partially strake-covered pipeline spans, to show that a relatively small fraction of well-placed strake coverage is enough to suppress in-line VIV.","PeriodicalId":345141,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: CFD and FSI","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: CFD and FSI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2019-95972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Excitation and added mass functions determined from forced vibration tests of a rigid cylinder undergoing harmonic motion in the flow are used in the semi-empirical software VIVANA to predict the VIV response of pipelines. An advantage of this approach, as opposed to the more-commonly-used response function approach, is that it can account for changing conditions along the length of the pipe, like changing current velocity, seabed proximity, and/or pipe diameter. This makes it useful for pipelines as well as for risers when such changes occur. Further, for pipelines, travelling wave effects play less of a role than for risers, so the VIVANA approach can be simplified by assuming the phase angle of the harmonic response is constant along the span. The interactions between cross-flow and in-line response that complicate the prediction of cross-flow VIV by the excitation function approach, do not arise for pure inline VIV. For the latter case, using the pure in-line forced vibration test data of Aronsen (2007), it is found that both VIVANA approach and simplified ‘SIVANA’ approach thereof predict VIV amplitudes consistent with experiments on flexible pipe (Ormen Lange umbilical VIV tests), and the DNVGL-RP-F105 response function for a range of structural and soil damping values. In a companion paper, this approach is applied partially strake-covered pipeline spans, to show that a relatively small fraction of well-placed strake coverage is enough to suppress in-line VIV.
基于强制振动试验的在线VIV
在半经验软件VIVANA中,利用刚性圆柱体在流动中受调和运动的强迫振动试验确定的激励和附加质量函数来预测管道的涡激振动响应。与更常用的响应函数方法相比,这种方法的一个优点是,它可以考虑沿管道长度变化的条件,如变化的流速、海底距离和/或管径。当这种变化发生时,这对管道和立管都很有用。此外,对于管道,行波效应的作用小于隔水管,因此可以通过假设谐波响应的相位角沿跨度恒定来简化VIVANA方法。交叉流和直列响应之间的相互作用使得用激励函数方法预测交叉流涡激振动变得复杂,而在纯直列涡激振动中则不会出现这种相互作用。对于后一种情况,使用Aronsen(2007)的纯在线强迫振动试验数据,发现其中的VIVANA方法和简化的“SIVANA”方法预测的振动幅值与柔性管道实验(Ormen Lange脐带振动试验)以及DNVGL-RP-F105对一系列结构和土壤阻尼值的响应函数一致。在一篇配套论文中,该方法应用于部分条带覆盖的管道跨度,表明相对较小比例的条带覆盖就足以抑制管内涡动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信