The Face of an Empire: Cosmetics and Whiteness in Imperial Portraits of Queen Elizabeth I

Tara Allen-Flanagan
{"title":"The Face of an Empire: Cosmetics and Whiteness in Imperial Portraits of Queen Elizabeth I","authors":"Tara Allen-Flanagan","doi":"10.5070/r73151193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Allen-Flanagan, Tara | Abstract: When Queen Elizabeth I entered her fifties, she grew reluctant to sit for any more portraits. The final three portraits that she sat for – the Armada Portrait, The Ditchley Portrait, and the Oliver Miniature – painted between the mid-1580s and her death in 1602, portray the Queen with a smooth, white face, and bright coral lips and cheeks. The style of painting the Queen’s face as seen in these last portraits were canonized as a pattern for future artists to follow when painting the Queen during and after the last years of her reign. In the Elizabethan era, the English government often attempted to control how the Queen was depicted in artwork; in 1596 the English Privy Council drafted a proclamation that required portraits of the Queen depict her as “beutyfull [sic] and magnanimous” as “God hathe blessed her.” In both art historical scholarship and popular culture, the Queen’s whitened skin and rouged lips and cheeks in her official portraiture are often cited as evidence of her vanity and waning looks. However, as I will explore in this paper, the use of cosmetics in the early-modern era was associated not only with narcissism, but with England’s colonial efforts. By considering discourses regarding both her status as a symbol of natural beauty and the racist associations that were associated with makeup application, I argue that the legibility of makeup on the Queen’s face in imperial portraits and preservation of this motif as a pattern can be read as a symbol of her imperial and racial domination in the Americas and in England.","PeriodicalId":343897,"journal":{"name":"Refract: An Open Access Visual Studies Journal","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Refract: An Open Access Visual Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/r73151193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Author(s): Allen-Flanagan, Tara | Abstract: When Queen Elizabeth I entered her fifties, she grew reluctant to sit for any more portraits. The final three portraits that she sat for – the Armada Portrait, The Ditchley Portrait, and the Oliver Miniature – painted between the mid-1580s and her death in 1602, portray the Queen with a smooth, white face, and bright coral lips and cheeks. The style of painting the Queen’s face as seen in these last portraits were canonized as a pattern for future artists to follow when painting the Queen during and after the last years of her reign. In the Elizabethan era, the English government often attempted to control how the Queen was depicted in artwork; in 1596 the English Privy Council drafted a proclamation that required portraits of the Queen depict her as “beutyfull [sic] and magnanimous” as “God hathe blessed her.” In both art historical scholarship and popular culture, the Queen’s whitened skin and rouged lips and cheeks in her official portraiture are often cited as evidence of her vanity and waning looks. However, as I will explore in this paper, the use of cosmetics in the early-modern era was associated not only with narcissism, but with England’s colonial efforts. By considering discourses regarding both her status as a symbol of natural beauty and the racist associations that were associated with makeup application, I argue that the legibility of makeup on the Queen’s face in imperial portraits and preservation of this motif as a pattern can be read as a symbol of her imperial and racial domination in the Americas and in England.
一个帝国的面孔:伊丽莎白一世帝国肖像中的化妆品和白色
摘要:英国女王伊丽莎白一世50多岁时,不愿再坐着拍照了。她的最后三幅肖像画——《无敌舰队肖像》、《迪奇利肖像》和《奥利弗微缩肖像画》——画于1580年代中期至1602年女王去世之间,描绘了女王光滑、白皙的脸,明亮的珊瑚色嘴唇和脸颊。在这些最后的肖像中,女王的面部绘画风格被奉为典范,未来的艺术家在女王统治的最后几年和之后为女王作画时,都要遵循这种风格。在伊丽莎白时代,英国政府经常试图控制女王在艺术品中的描绘方式;1596年,英国枢密院起草了一份宣言,要求女王的肖像将她描绘成“美丽而宽宏大量”,“上帝保佑她”。在艺术史学术和流行文化中,女王的官方肖像中,她白皙的皮肤、胭脂的嘴唇和脸颊经常被引用为她虚荣心和憔悴容貌的证据。然而,正如我将在本文中探讨的那样,在近代早期,化妆品的使用不仅与自恋有关,而且与英国的殖民努力有关。通过考虑关于她作为自然美象征的地位和与化妆有关的种族主义联想的话语,我认为,在皇家肖像中,女王脸上的化妆品的易读性以及这一主题作为一种模式的保存可以被解读为她在美洲和英国的帝国和种族统治的象征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信