Impact of Scholar-Practitioners Gap on Research Output in Kenyan Hospitality Industry

Patrick G Muchai, B. Wadongo, T. Olielo
{"title":"Impact of Scholar-Practitioners Gap on Research Output in Kenyan Hospitality Industry","authors":"Patrick G Muchai, B. Wadongo, T. Olielo","doi":"10.7176/jths/45-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of this study were to establish the extent to which scholars research are relevant to practitioners and to establish the strategies used by scholars to disseminate research findings for practitioners’ consumption in Kenyan hospitality industry. The study used the mixed-method approach. The study used the convergent design, where both qualitative and quantitative data sets were collected and analysed simultaneously. A total of 389 respondents participated in this study, including 226 hospitality practitioners and 163 hospitality scholars in Kenya. The study found out that most research done by the hospitality scholars in Kenya are based on a hypothetical problem rather than pragmatic ones. Scholars use jargons, abbreviations, and statistical language in their research that are incomprehensible by practitioners, this reduces the usability of research ideas by the practitioners. The study also found out that practitioners are willing to participate in research activities when they are invited, given time and supported by their organisations. Keywords: Scholar-practitioner gap, Research relevance, Research dissemination, Hospitality, Kenya DOI : 10.7176/JTHS/45-05 Publication date: December 31 st 2019","PeriodicalId":121427,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Sports","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/jths/45-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to establish the extent to which scholars research are relevant to practitioners and to establish the strategies used by scholars to disseminate research findings for practitioners’ consumption in Kenyan hospitality industry. The study used the mixed-method approach. The study used the convergent design, where both qualitative and quantitative data sets were collected and analysed simultaneously. A total of 389 respondents participated in this study, including 226 hospitality practitioners and 163 hospitality scholars in Kenya. The study found out that most research done by the hospitality scholars in Kenya are based on a hypothetical problem rather than pragmatic ones. Scholars use jargons, abbreviations, and statistical language in their research that are incomprehensible by practitioners, this reduces the usability of research ideas by the practitioners. The study also found out that practitioners are willing to participate in research activities when they are invited, given time and supported by their organisations. Keywords: Scholar-practitioner gap, Research relevance, Research dissemination, Hospitality, Kenya DOI : 10.7176/JTHS/45-05 Publication date: December 31 st 2019
学者-从业者差距对肯尼亚酒店业研究产出的影响
本研究的目的是确定学者的研究在多大程度上与从业人员相关,并确定学者使用的策略,以传播肯尼亚酒店业从业人员消费的研究成果。本研究采用混合方法。该研究采用了趋同设计,同时收集和分析定性和定量数据集。共有389名受访者参与了这项研究,其中包括226名肯尼亚的酒店从业人员和163名酒店学者。研究发现,肯尼亚酒店学者所做的大多数研究都是基于假设问题,而不是实际问题。学者在他们的研究中使用行话、缩略语和统计语言,从业者无法理解,这降低了从业者研究思想的可用性。该研究还发现,当从业者受到组织的邀请、给予时间和支持时,他们愿意参与研究活动。关键词:学者-从业者差距,研究相关性,研究传播,酒店,肯尼亚DOI: 10.7176/JTHS/45-05出版日期:2019年12月31日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信