Does the Oil Price Influence the Exchange Rates in Nigeria? Empirical Evidence from Wavelet and Causality Approaches

T. Adebayo
{"title":"Does the Oil Price Influence the Exchange Rates in Nigeria? Empirical Evidence from Wavelet and Causality Approaches","authors":"T. Adebayo","doi":"10.20448/journal.501.2020.72.126.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the connection between the exchange rate and oil price within the framework of time and frequency utilizing monthly data between January 2007 and March 2020. The study deployed the wavelet tools to investigate this relationship. Furthermore, Granger and Toda Yamamoto causality tests were employed as a robustness check for the wavelet coherence techniques. Findings from the wavelet power spectrum shows; (a) a significant vulnerability in the exchange rate between 2014M6 and 201412, between 2017M1 and 2017M12 2016M1; and (b) a significant vulnerability was found in oil price between 2008M1 and 2008M12, between 2014M1 and 2014M12. The wavelet coherence technique reveals; (a) negative co-movement between the exchange rate and oil price between 2009M10 and 2011M3, between 2012M1 and 2012M3, between 2014M2, 2015M6 and between 2019M2 and 2019M11. The Granger and Toda Yamamoto causality tests reveal a bidirectional interaction between oil price and exchange rate. The variance decomposition shows that as the months dwindle, 40.2% and 40.5% of discrepancy in the exchange rate can be explained by oil price in the twenty-third and twenty-fourth month respectively. This signifies that oil price is a good predictor of the exchange rate in the long term. Also, the variance decomposition and causality tests provide a piece of supportive evidence for the wavelet coherence technique. Key recommendations are suggested based on these findings.","PeriodicalId":360581,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.501.2020.72.126.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study explores the connection between the exchange rate and oil price within the framework of time and frequency utilizing monthly data between January 2007 and March 2020. The study deployed the wavelet tools to investigate this relationship. Furthermore, Granger and Toda Yamamoto causality tests were employed as a robustness check for the wavelet coherence techniques. Findings from the wavelet power spectrum shows; (a) a significant vulnerability in the exchange rate between 2014M6 and 201412, between 2017M1 and 2017M12 2016M1; and (b) a significant vulnerability was found in oil price between 2008M1 and 2008M12, between 2014M1 and 2014M12. The wavelet coherence technique reveals; (a) negative co-movement between the exchange rate and oil price between 2009M10 and 2011M3, between 2012M1 and 2012M3, between 2014M2, 2015M6 and between 2019M2 and 2019M11. The Granger and Toda Yamamoto causality tests reveal a bidirectional interaction between oil price and exchange rate. The variance decomposition shows that as the months dwindle, 40.2% and 40.5% of discrepancy in the exchange rate can be explained by oil price in the twenty-third and twenty-fourth month respectively. This signifies that oil price is a good predictor of the exchange rate in the long term. Also, the variance decomposition and causality tests provide a piece of supportive evidence for the wavelet coherence technique. Key recommendations are suggested based on these findings.
油价对尼日利亚汇率有影响吗?来自小波和因果关系方法的经验证据
本研究利用2007年1月至2020年3月的月度数据,在时间和频率的框架内探讨了汇率与油价之间的联系。本研究使用小波分析工具来研究这种关系。此外,格兰杰和Toda山本因果检验被用作小波相干技术的鲁棒性检验。小波功率谱分析结果表明:(a)在2014M6和201412之间,2017M1和2017M12之间,2016M1之间的汇率存在重大脆弱性;(b) 2008年m1至2008年m12、2014年m1至2014年m12期间油价存在显著脆弱性。小波相干技术揭示;(a)在2009M10和2011M3之间、2012M1和2012M3之间、2014M2和2015M6之间以及2019M2和2019M11之间,汇率与油价负联动。Granger和Toda Yamamoto因果检验揭示了油价与汇率之间的双向交互作用。方差分解表明,随着月份的减少,第23个月和第24个月的油价分别可以解释40.2%和40.5%的汇率差异。这表明油价是长期汇率的良好预测指标。同时,方差分解和因果关系检验也为小波相干技术提供了支持性证据。根据这些调查结果提出了关键建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信