Open Banking: Regulatory Challenges for a New Form of Financial Intermediation in a Data-Driven World

Nydia Remolina
{"title":"Open Banking: Regulatory Challenges for a New Form of Financial Intermediation in a Data-Driven World","authors":"Nydia Remolina","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3475019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data has taken immense importance in the last years. Consider the amount of data that is being collected worldwide every day, industries are reshaping their activities into a data-driven business. The digital transformation of all industries, portent of the fourth industrial revolution, is creating a new kind of economy based on the datafication of almost any aspect of human social, political and economic activity as a result of the information generated by the numerous daily routines of digitally connected individuals and technology. The financial services industry is part of this trend. Embracing the digital revolution and creating the right foundations allow incumbent financial institutions to disrupt their own business model. Hence, financial institutions are creating new businesses within their existing structures that adapt and collaborate to meet the challenges of digital transformation and make better use, faster, of their enduring source of competitive advantage – their own customer insight. Open banking and banking as a service (BaaS) are emerging as new forms of intermediation in the financial system that portraits positive and negative externalities for the financial system. Both concepts – open banking and BaaS – refer to the use of open Application Programming Interfaces that enable third parties to build applications and services around a financial institution that exposes its data and/or its infrastructure. The use of these schemes represents a new form of intersection between data and finance, which is changing the way traditional products, services and customer experience traditionally work in the financial sector. This paper explains the open banking and BaaS foundations and what they exactly entail. It also explores the benefits and risks that this interaction between financial institutions and third parties portrait for the financial services industry and analyses from a comparative perspective the different approaches financial, data privacy and competition regulators have implemented to boost open banking phenom. This paper argues that the compulsory approach to open banking is not in all cases the best approach for capitalizing the benefits of open banking and managing its risks. Indeed, some regulators have proposed a compulsory approach to open banking regulations to increase competition in retail banking or in the payment systems. In opposition, this paper argues that open banking and BaaS models in the financial industry might lead to more concentration and these risks have been understated by financial regulators and competition authorities. Finally, we provide some policy recommendations regarding open banking regulations, such as: the same regulatory approach should not apply to all jurisdictions, regulators should encourage reciprocity, especially when choosing the compulsory approach, coordination among different regulatory authorities is needed on a national and international levels, risk-based regulation is a correct type of approach, and monetization of data should not be restricted for incumbents.","PeriodicalId":286147,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Corporate & Financial Law: Interdisciplinary Approaches eJournal","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Corporate & Financial Law: Interdisciplinary Approaches eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3475019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Data has taken immense importance in the last years. Consider the amount of data that is being collected worldwide every day, industries are reshaping their activities into a data-driven business. The digital transformation of all industries, portent of the fourth industrial revolution, is creating a new kind of economy based on the datafication of almost any aspect of human social, political and economic activity as a result of the information generated by the numerous daily routines of digitally connected individuals and technology. The financial services industry is part of this trend. Embracing the digital revolution and creating the right foundations allow incumbent financial institutions to disrupt their own business model. Hence, financial institutions are creating new businesses within their existing structures that adapt and collaborate to meet the challenges of digital transformation and make better use, faster, of their enduring source of competitive advantage – their own customer insight. Open banking and banking as a service (BaaS) are emerging as new forms of intermediation in the financial system that portraits positive and negative externalities for the financial system. Both concepts – open banking and BaaS – refer to the use of open Application Programming Interfaces that enable third parties to build applications and services around a financial institution that exposes its data and/or its infrastructure. The use of these schemes represents a new form of intersection between data and finance, which is changing the way traditional products, services and customer experience traditionally work in the financial sector. This paper explains the open banking and BaaS foundations and what they exactly entail. It also explores the benefits and risks that this interaction between financial institutions and third parties portrait for the financial services industry and analyses from a comparative perspective the different approaches financial, data privacy and competition regulators have implemented to boost open banking phenom. This paper argues that the compulsory approach to open banking is not in all cases the best approach for capitalizing the benefits of open banking and managing its risks. Indeed, some regulators have proposed a compulsory approach to open banking regulations to increase competition in retail banking or in the payment systems. In opposition, this paper argues that open banking and BaaS models in the financial industry might lead to more concentration and these risks have been understated by financial regulators and competition authorities. Finally, we provide some policy recommendations regarding open banking regulations, such as: the same regulatory approach should not apply to all jurisdictions, regulators should encourage reciprocity, especially when choosing the compulsory approach, coordination among different regulatory authorities is needed on a national and international levels, risk-based regulation is a correct type of approach, and monetization of data should not be restricted for incumbents.
开放银行:数据驱动世界中金融中介新形式的监管挑战
在过去的几年里,数据变得非常重要。考虑到每天在全球范围内收集的数据量,各行业正在将其活动重塑为数据驱动的业务。作为第四次工业革命的前兆,所有行业的数字化转型正在创造一种基于人类社会、政治和经济活动几乎所有方面的数据化的新型经济,这是由数字连接的个人和技术所产生的大量日常生活所产生的信息的结果。金融服务业是这一趋势的一部分。拥抱数字革命并建立正确的基础,可以让现有的金融机构颠覆自己的商业模式。因此,金融机构正在其现有结构中创建新业务,以适应和合作应对数字化转型的挑战,并更好、更快地利用其持久的竞争优势来源——他们自己的客户洞察力。开放银行和银行即服务(BaaS)正在成为金融体系中新的中介形式,为金融体系描绘了积极和消极的外部性。开放银行和BaaS这两个概念都是指使用开放的应用程序编程接口,使第三方能够围绕公开其数据和/或基础设施的金融机构构建应用程序和服务。这些方案的使用代表了数据与金融之间一种新的交叉形式,正在改变金融领域传统产品、服务和客户体验的运作方式。本文解释了开放银行和BaaS的基础,以及它们究竟需要什么。它还探讨了金融机构和第三方之间的这种互动对金融服务行业的好处和风险,并从比较的角度分析了金融、数据隐私和竞争监管机构为促进开放银行现象而实施的不同方法。本文认为,强制开放银行并非在所有情况下都是利用开放银行收益和管理其风险的最佳途径。事实上,一些监管机构已提议采取强制方式开放银行业监管,以增加零售银行或支付系统的竞争。相反,本文认为金融业的开放式银行和BaaS模式可能导致更多的集中,这些风险被金融监管机构和竞争主管部门低估了。最后,我们提出了一些关于开放银行监管的政策建议,例如:相同的监管方法不应适用于所有司法管辖区;监管机构应鼓励互惠,特别是在选择强制性方法时;不同监管机构之间需要在国家和国际层面进行协调;基于风险的监管是一种正确的方法;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信