Fundamentals of the ASTM International Committee D22 Practice for Determination of the Detection Limit of a Well-Behaved Analytical Method

M. Brisson, H. L. Rook
{"title":"Fundamentals of the ASTM International Committee D22 Practice for Determination of the Detection Limit of a Well-Behaved Analytical Method","authors":"M. Brisson, H. L. Rook","doi":"10.1520/stp161820180128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of detection limits dates back to the 1960s, with the best ‐ known treatise being Lloyd Currie’s 1968 definition of “detection limit” in terms of a “critical level.” The concept is important for scientists, policymakers, instrument manufacturers, and other stakeholders. It remains a source of controversy, however, because although the theory is based in statistics, it is applied by analytical practitioners. This is not always compatible . Over the past half ‐ century, there have been many formulations, some developed for particular programs, and with these formulations, a cornucopia of terms and abbreviations, presenting challenges for a laboratory dealing with the requirements of different programs. Currie’s principles were solidified in the 1995 International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry recommendations and International Organization for Standardization 11843 series. These principles have been embraced in Europe, but not in the United States. One possible reason is that the concepts focus on underlying statistics and not on practical application. The goal of ASTM Committee D22 on Air Quality is to begin with the smallest common denominator, a well ‐ behaved air quality method, and then to standardize a practice that has statistical rigor; will be understood and used by the analytical community; and, perhaps most important, will produce consistent results. Committee D22 hopes to expand on this admittedly narrow focus in the future. This paper describes fundamental concepts of the Committee D22 methodology, based on Currie’s 1968 and 1999 papers. It uses a one ‐ sided test of significance to affirm or reject the null hypothesis (analyte not detected). Rejection of the null is used to determine a value above the mean background that represents detection of the analyte signal with a stated probability of repeatability. It evaluates all significant error sources and uses the magnitude and variance of the background and combined error to estimate the detection limit.","PeriodicalId":221385,"journal":{"name":"Detection Limits in Air Quality and Environmental Measurements","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Detection Limits in Air Quality and Environmental Measurements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1520/stp161820180128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of detection limits dates back to the 1960s, with the best ‐ known treatise being Lloyd Currie’s 1968 definition of “detection limit” in terms of a “critical level.” The concept is important for scientists, policymakers, instrument manufacturers, and other stakeholders. It remains a source of controversy, however, because although the theory is based in statistics, it is applied by analytical practitioners. This is not always compatible . Over the past half ‐ century, there have been many formulations, some developed for particular programs, and with these formulations, a cornucopia of terms and abbreviations, presenting challenges for a laboratory dealing with the requirements of different programs. Currie’s principles were solidified in the 1995 International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry recommendations and International Organization for Standardization 11843 series. These principles have been embraced in Europe, but not in the United States. One possible reason is that the concepts focus on underlying statistics and not on practical application. The goal of ASTM Committee D22 on Air Quality is to begin with the smallest common denominator, a well ‐ behaved air quality method, and then to standardize a practice that has statistical rigor; will be understood and used by the analytical community; and, perhaps most important, will produce consistent results. Committee D22 hopes to expand on this admittedly narrow focus in the future. This paper describes fundamental concepts of the Committee D22 methodology, based on Currie’s 1968 and 1999 papers. It uses a one ‐ sided test of significance to affirm or reject the null hypothesis (analyte not detected). Rejection of the null is used to determine a value above the mean background that represents detection of the analyte signal with a stated probability of repeatability. It evaluates all significant error sources and uses the magnitude and variance of the background and combined error to estimate the detection limit.
ASTM国际委员会D22规范的基础,用于确定良好的分析方法的检测限
检测限的概念可以追溯到20世纪60年代,最著名的论文是1968年Lloyd Currie在“临界水平”方面对“检测限”的定义。这一概念对科学家、决策者、仪器制造商和其他利益相关者很重要。然而,它仍然是一个争议的来源,因为尽管该理论是基于统计学的,但它被分析从业者应用。这并不总是兼容的。在过去的半个世纪里,出现了许多公式,其中一些是为特定的项目开发的,这些公式带来了丰富的术语和缩写,为实验室处理不同项目的要求提出了挑战。Currie的原理在1995年国际纯粹与应用化学联合会的建议和国际标准化组织11843系列中得到了巩固。这些原则在欧洲得到了接受,但在美国却没有。一个可能的原因是,这些概念侧重于基础统计,而不是实际应用。ASTM D22空气质量委员会的目标是从最小公分母开始,一个良好的空气质量方法,然后标准化具有统计严谨性的实践;将被分析社区理解和使用;而且,也许最重要的是,将产生一致的结果。D22委员会希望今后扩大这一公认狭隘的重点。本文描述了委员会D22方法的基本概念,基于Currie 1968年和1999年的论文。它使用单侧显著性检验来确认或拒绝原假设(未检测到分析物)。拒绝null用于确定高于平均背景的值,该值表示以规定的可重复性概率对分析物信号进行检测。它评估所有重要误差源,并使用背景和综合误差的大小和方差来估计检测极限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信