Deferring Future Damages to Future Tribunals: The Jurisdictional Obstacles

Peter Tzeng
{"title":"Deferring Future Damages to Future Tribunals: The Jurisdictional Obstacles","authors":"Peter Tzeng","doi":"10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIV050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Awarding compensation for future damages arising from continuing breaches has long vexed investment tribunals. This article examines the newest solution to the problem: deferring an award on future damages to a future tribunal. In 2015, for the very first time, an investment tribunal was constituted for the sole purpose of awarding compensation for deferred damages. Yet even if everything proceeds according to plan in that specific case, this article argues that the practice of deferring an award on future damages to a future tribunal raises significant jurisdictional obstacles that undermine its universal applicability.","PeriodicalId":131966,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Dispute Resolution (Topic)","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Dispute Resolution (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ICSIDREVIEW/SIV050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Awarding compensation for future damages arising from continuing breaches has long vexed investment tribunals. This article examines the newest solution to the problem: deferring an award on future damages to a future tribunal. In 2015, for the very first time, an investment tribunal was constituted for the sole purpose of awarding compensation for deferred damages. Yet even if everything proceeds according to plan in that specific case, this article argues that the practice of deferring an award on future damages to a future tribunal raises significant jurisdictional obstacles that undermine its universal applicability.
将未来的损害赔偿推迟到未来的法庭:司法障碍
长期以来,投资法庭一直在为持续违约造成的未来损害作出赔偿。本文探讨了解决这一问题的最新办法:将对未来损害赔偿的裁决推迟到未来的法庭。2015年,首次成立了一个投资法庭,其唯一目的是对延期损害赔偿进行赔偿。然而,即使在该具体案件中一切都按计划进行,本文认为,将对未来损害赔偿的裁决推迟到未来法庭的做法,也会产生重大的司法障碍,破坏其普遍适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信