Prevalence of refractive errors among school children in Wangsa Maju, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Lili Asma Ismail, Sheiladevi Sukumaran
{"title":"Prevalence of refractive errors among school children in Wangsa Maju, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia","authors":"Lili Asma Ismail, Sheiladevi Sukumaran","doi":"10.51329/mehdioptometry158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Uncorrected refractive error is the most common cause of vision impairment and the second leading cause of blindness worldwide. Its prevalence differs among and within countries. This study was aimed at exploring the pattern and prevalence of refractive error among school children in the Wangsa Maju Township, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. \nMethods: A stratified, multistage, cluster random sampling in a geographically defined area was employed, and 245 school children, aged 8–12 years, from two primary schools in Wangsa Maju Township, Kuala Lumpur, were recruited. The cross-sectional study employed interviewing, measuring uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA) using the Snellen chart, cycloplegic refraction under a streak retinoscope refined subjectively, and a detailed slit-lamp examination to assess the anterior and posterior segments. Myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism were defined as spherical equivalent (SE) greater than or equal to - 0.50, SE greater than or equal to + 2.00, and cylindrical greater than or equal to 0.75 D, respectively. Reduced UCDVA was defined as an unaided visual acuity < 6/9. \nResults: The mean (standard deviation) age of the participants was 10.42 (1.22) years. The overall prevalence of refractive error was 47.8%. Of 245 screened school children, including 42 (35.9%) boys and 75 (64.1%) girls, 117 had refractive error, with a prevalence of refractive error of 17.1% and 30.6% in boys and girls, respectively. Myopia was the most common type (30.2%), followed by astigmatism (16.3%) and hyperopia (1.2%). The prevalence of reduced UCDVA was 36.3% among the screened school children, attributable to refractive error with a significantly high positive correlation (r = +.721; P < 0.01). Among those with refractive errors, sex differences in the magnitude of refractive errors were not statistically significant in the three types of refractive errors (all P > 0.05). \nConclusions: The prevalence of refractive error among primary school children in Wangsa Maju Township, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia was 47.8%; girls outnumbered boys, but the magnitude of refractive errors showed no sex differences. The prevalence of reduced UCDVA was 36.3%, attributable to refractive error. Irrespective of sex, myopia had the highest prevalence compared to other refractive errors, and its prevalence increased with age. Future population-based studies are required to address the limitations concerning environmental risk factors for refractive error and the impact of ethnic or familial backgrounds on their prevalence in a similar but larger population using the same protocol.","PeriodicalId":370751,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypothesis, discovery &amp; innovation in optometry","volume":"213 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypothesis, discovery &amp; innovation in optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51329/mehdioptometry158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Uncorrected refractive error is the most common cause of vision impairment and the second leading cause of blindness worldwide. Its prevalence differs among and within countries. This study was aimed at exploring the pattern and prevalence of refractive error among school children in the Wangsa Maju Township, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Methods: A stratified, multistage, cluster random sampling in a geographically defined area was employed, and 245 school children, aged 8–12 years, from two primary schools in Wangsa Maju Township, Kuala Lumpur, were recruited. The cross-sectional study employed interviewing, measuring uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA) using the Snellen chart, cycloplegic refraction under a streak retinoscope refined subjectively, and a detailed slit-lamp examination to assess the anterior and posterior segments. Myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism were defined as spherical equivalent (SE) greater than or equal to - 0.50, SE greater than or equal to + 2.00, and cylindrical greater than or equal to 0.75 D, respectively. Reduced UCDVA was defined as an unaided visual acuity < 6/9. Results: The mean (standard deviation) age of the participants was 10.42 (1.22) years. The overall prevalence of refractive error was 47.8%. Of 245 screened school children, including 42 (35.9%) boys and 75 (64.1%) girls, 117 had refractive error, with a prevalence of refractive error of 17.1% and 30.6% in boys and girls, respectively. Myopia was the most common type (30.2%), followed by astigmatism (16.3%) and hyperopia (1.2%). The prevalence of reduced UCDVA was 36.3% among the screened school children, attributable to refractive error with a significantly high positive correlation (r = +.721; P < 0.01). Among those with refractive errors, sex differences in the magnitude of refractive errors were not statistically significant in the three types of refractive errors (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: The prevalence of refractive error among primary school children in Wangsa Maju Township, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia was 47.8%; girls outnumbered boys, but the magnitude of refractive errors showed no sex differences. The prevalence of reduced UCDVA was 36.3%, attributable to refractive error. Irrespective of sex, myopia had the highest prevalence compared to other refractive errors, and its prevalence increased with age. Future population-based studies are required to address the limitations concerning environmental risk factors for refractive error and the impact of ethnic or familial backgrounds on their prevalence in a similar but larger population using the same protocol.
马来西亚吉隆坡Wangsa Maju地区学童屈光不正患病率调查
背景:未经矫正的屈光不正是视力损害的最常见原因,也是全世界致盲的第二大原因。其流行程度在国家之间和国家内部有所不同。本研究旨在探讨马来西亚吉隆坡Wangsa Maju镇学童屈光不正的模式和患病率。方法:采用分层、多阶段、整群随机抽样的方法,对吉隆坡旺萨马驹乡两所小学8-12岁的245名在校儿童进行调查。横断面研究采用访谈,使用Snellen表测量未校正距离视力(UCDVA),在主观改进的条纹视网膜镜下测量单眼麻痹性屈光,以及详细的裂隙灯检查来评估前、后段。近视、远视和散光分别定义为球面等效(SE)大于等于- 0.50、SE大于等于+ 2.00、柱面等效大于等于0.75 D。UCDVA降低定义为独立视力< 6/9。结果:参与者的平均(标准差)年龄为10.42(1.22)岁。屈光不正的总发生率为47.8%。在245名接受筛查的学童中,包括42名(35.9%)男孩和75名(64.1%)女孩,其中117名有屈光不正,其中男孩和女孩的屈光不正患病率分别为17.1%和30.6%。近视最为常见(30.2%),其次是散光(16.3%)和远视(1.2%)。在接受筛查的学龄儿童中,UCDVA降低的患病率为36.3%,归因于屈光不正,两者具有显著的高正相关(r = +.721;P < 0.01)。在屈光不正患者中,三种屈光不正的性别屈光不正度数差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:马来西亚吉隆坡旺萨马驹镇小学生屈光不正患病率为47.8%;女孩比男孩多,但屈光不正的程度没有性别差异。屈光不正导致UCDVA降低的发生率为36.3%。不论性别,与其他屈光不正相比,近视的发病率最高,并且随着年龄的增长而增加。未来的以人群为基础的研究需要解决屈光不正的环境风险因素的局限性,以及种族或家庭背景对其在使用相同方案的类似但更大的人群中的患病率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信